Supplier, Tailor, and Facilitator: Typology of Platform Business Models

The platform business model is widely used because it is capable of various open innovation deliverables. However, it has a high probability of failure, caused by a variety of value streams that follow the two-sided market theory (each side has a distinct group of users). Therefore, extensive research on value streams and the attributes of platform business is essential to reduce platform business failure and ensure sustainable growth. By analyzing 21 case studies and conducting 30 in-depth interviews, this study proposes three types of Internet platform business strategies which can serve as a frame of reference to examine the impact of different value streams and open innovation on platform businesses. This study highlights a typology that sheds light on the heterogeneous meaning that corporates associated with creating new platform businesses adhere to and seeks to improve understanding of fundamental differences in platform business creation processes.

[1]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[2]  W. Firestone,et al.  Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability , 1983 .

[3]  M. Porter.  TECHNOLOGY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 1985 .

[4]  W. Trochim.  Outcome pattern matching and program theory , 1989 .

[5]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[6]  I. Dey.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[7]  Nick Rich,et al.  The seven value stream mapping tools , 1997 .

[8]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  CONFIGURING VALUE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: ON CHAINS, SHOPS, AND NETWORKS , 1998 .

[9]  Paul Timmers,et al.  Business Models for Electronic Markets , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[10]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[11]  B. Mahadevan.  Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy , 2000 .

[12]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[13]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Revenue streams and digital content providers: an empirical investigation , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[14]  T. May,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing: Asking, Listening and Intepreting , 2002 .

[15]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[16]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[17]  S. Read.  Applications of Case Study Research , 2003 .

[18]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[19]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[20]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  M. Armstrong.  Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[22]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[23]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[24]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[25]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[26]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[27]  C. Williams,et al.  Informal economic activities and deprived neighbourhoods. , 2006 .

[28]  Andrei Hagiu.  Merchant or Two-Sided Platform? , 2006 .

[29]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts , 2004 .

[30]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[31]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[32]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Markets with Two-Sided Platforms , 2008 .

[33]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[34]  Marc Rysman.  The Economics of Two-Sided Markets , 2009 .

[35]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[36]  D. Teece.  Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation , 2010 .

[37]  I. Miles.  The development of technology foresight: A review , 2010 .

[38]  D. Teece.  Technological Innovation and the Theory of the Firm , 2010 .

[39]  R. Amit,et al.  Business Model Innovation: Creating Value in Times of Change , 2010 .

[40]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Value Chains, Donor Interventions and Poverty Reduction: A Review of Donor Practice , 2010 .

[41]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[42]  Varun Grover,et al.  Cocreating IT Value: New Capabilities and Metrics for Multifirm Environments , 2012, MIS Q..

[43]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[44]  A. Smedlund.  Value Cocreation in Service Platform Business Models , 2012 .

[45]  C. Staritz.  Value chains for development? Potentials and limitations of global value chain approaches in donor interventions , 2012 .

[46]  Development and the diffusion of technology , 2013 .

[47]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[48]  A. Gawer.  Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[49]  Platform Business and Network Strategy , 2014 .

[50]  Nan Zhang,et al.  Value Networks and Two-Sided Markets of Internet Content Delivery , 2014 .

[51]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  الهدم الخلاق Creative Destruction , 2014 .

[52]  Junghee Han,et al.  Platform business Eco-model evolution: case study on KakaoTalk in Korea , 2015 .

[53]  Junic Kim.  The platform business model and business ecosystem: quality management and revenue structures* , 2016 .

[54]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[55]  The platform business model and strategy : a dynamic analysis of the value chain and platform business , 2016 .

[56]  G. Kaa,et al.  Platform control during battles for market dominance: The case of Apple versus IBM in the early personal computer industry , 2016 .

[57]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Ron Adner,et al.  Ecosystem as Structure , 2017 .

[59]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[60]  Xiaoyue Jiang,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm , 2016, MIS Q..

[61]  Ashish Agarwal,et al.  Platform Integration and Demand Spillovers in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Facebook's Integration of Instagram , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[63]  S. Nambisan,et al.  On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship , 2018, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[64]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[65]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Correspondence , 2018 .

[66]  Masaharu Tsujimoto,et al.  New market development of platform ecosystems: A case study of the Nintendo Wii , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[67]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems , 2018, Research Policy.

[68]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[69]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity in Platform Markets: Implications for Complementors , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Junic Kim.  Platform Adoption Factors in the Internet Industry , 2018, Sustainability.

[71]  Lucie Povolná,et al.  Innovation Strategy in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the Context of Growth and Recession Indicators , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[72]  Yuki Inoue.  Winner-Takes-All or Co-Evolution among Platform Ecosystems: A Look at the Competitive and Symbiotic Actions of Complementors , 2019, Sustainability.

[73]  Junic Kim,et al.  The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Environmental Uncertainty on Korean Technology Firms’ R&D Investment , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.