3DRA Reconstruction of Intracranial Aneurysms – How does Voxel Size Influences Morphologic and Hemodynamic Parameters

Three-dimensional shape analysis and imagebased hemodynamic simulations are widely used to assess the individual rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. However, the quality of those results highly depends on pre-simulative working steps including image reconstruction and segmentation. Within this study, three patient-specific aneurysms were reconstructed using three different voxel sizes (0.1 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.5 mm). Afterwards, 3D segmentations and time-dependent blood flow simulations were carried out to evaluate the impact of the reconstruction size. The results indicate that overall all voxel sizes lead to a qualitatively good agreement with respect to the aneurysm surfaces. However, deviations occur regarding the neck representation as well as the consideration of perforating arteries. Further, morphological differences lead to clear hemodynamic variations, especially for shear force predictions. The findings indicate that depending on the desired analysis, careful reconstruction parameter selection is required. Particularly, for quantitative morphology and blood flow studies, the early step of reconstruction can have a crucial effect on subsequent results.

[1]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow in coiled cerebral aneurysms. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  David A Steinman,et al.  The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  C. Putman,et al.  Quantitative Characterization of the Hemodynamic Environment in Ruptured and Unruptured Brain Aneurysms , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Thomas Redel,et al.  Bringing hemodynamic simulations closer to the clinics: A CFD prototype study for intracranial aneurysms , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  C Chnafa,et al.  Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  S Saalfeld,et al.  Does the DSA reconstruction kernel affect hemodynamic predictions in intracranial aneurysms? An analysis of geometry and blood flow variations , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[8]  Alexandra Lauric,et al.  Critical role of angiographic acquisition modality and reconstruction on morphometric and haemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[9]  G. Janiga,et al.  Cerebral blood flow in a healthy Circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  A. Algra,et al.  Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. , 1998, Stroke.

[11]  D. Steinman,et al.  Estimation of Inlet Flow Rates for Image-Based Aneurysm CFD Models: Where and How to Begin? , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.