Impact of an intra-cycle motion correction algorithm on overall evaluability and diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography

[1]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Very Low-Dose (0.15 mGy) Chest CT Protocols Using the COPDGene 2 Test Object and a Third-Generation Dual-Source CT Scanner With Corresponding Third-Generation Iterative Reconstruction Software , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Michael Fiechter,et al.  Impact of a new motion-correction algorithm on image quality of low-dose coronary CT angiography in patients with insufficient heart rate control. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[3]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Heart rate control with oral ivabradine in computed tomography coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of 7.5 mg vs 5 mg regimen. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Prediction of adverse clinical outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of high-sensitivity troponin I and quantitative CT parameters. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[5]  D. Andreini,et al.  Radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses: a meta-analysis. , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  James K Min,et al.  Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications. , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[7]  J. Babb,et al.  Low-dose, prospective triggered high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[8]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Incremental value and safety of oral ivabradine for heart rate reduction in computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2012, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  D. Andreini,et al.  Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering coronary MDCT angiography. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[10]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Relationship between heart rate and optimal reconstruction phase in dual-source CT coronary angiography. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[11]  Jie Tang,et al.  Temporal resolution improvement in cardiac CT using PICCS (TRI-PICCS): performance studies. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  R. Morin,et al.  Expert Consensus Document 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents , 2010 .

[13]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Ilan Gottlieb,et al.  Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Marcel van Straten,et al.  Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  D. Andreini,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Cardiac CT: how much can temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and volume coverage be improved? , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[18]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[20]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Werner Bautz,et al.  Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[22]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[23]  C. Herzog,et al.  Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? , 2007, Radiology.

[24]  D. Andreini,et al.  Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate , 2007, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[25]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  A model for temporal resolution of multidetector computed tomography of coronary arteries in relation to rotation time, heart rate and reconstruction algorithm , 2007, European Radiology.

[26]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[27]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. , 2006, Medical physics.

[28]  Eric Perrier,et al.  Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[30]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[31]  Thomas J Vogl,et al.  Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[32]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[34]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  T. Brady,et al.  Evaluation of Retrospective Multisector and Half Scan ECG-Gated Multidetector Cardiac CT Protocols with Moving Phantoms , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[36]  Akihisa Tamura,et al.  Technical innovation of cardiac multirow detector CT using multisector reconstruction. , 2002, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[37]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary Artery Motion During the Cardiac Cycle and Optimal ECG Triggering for Coronary Artery Imaging , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[38]  A. Scott,et al.  A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. , 1992, Biometrics.

[39]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.