Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Brucella Infection in Dairy Animals in Urban and Rural Areas of Bihar and Assam, India

This study assessed seropositivity of Brucella infection in dairy animals and risk factors associated with it. The cross-sectional study used multi-stage, random sampling in the states of Bihar and Assam in India. In total, 740 dairy animals belonging to 534 households of 52 villages were covered under this study. Serological testing was conducted by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). Animal-level Brucella seropositivity was found to be 15.9% in Assam and 0.3% in Bihar. Seropositivity in urban areas (18.7%) of Assam was found to be higher than in rural areas (12.4%). Bihar was excluded from the risk factor analysis, as only one Brucella seropositive sample was detected in the state. A total of 30 variables were studied for assessing risk factors, of which 15 were selected for multivariable regression analyses following a systematic process. Finally, only three risk factors were identified as statistically significant. It was found that animals belonging to districts having smaller-sized herds were less likely (p < 0.001) to be Brucella seropositive than animals belonging to districts having larger-sized herds. Furthermore, the chance of being Brucella seropositive increased (p = 0.007) with the increase in age of dairy animals, but decreased (p = 0.072) with the adoption of artificial insemination (AI) for breeding. We speculated that the identified risk factors in Assam likely explained the reason behind lower Brucella seropositivity in Bihar, and therefore any future brucellosis control program should focus on addressing these risk factors.

[1]  D. Grace,et al.  Knowledge and practices of dairy farmers relating to brucellosis in urban, peri-urban and rural areas of Assam and Bihar, India , 2020, Infection ecology & epidemiology.

[2]  Chauhan,et al.  Risk Factors for Brucella Seroprevalence in Peri-Urban Dairy Farms in Five Indian Cities , 2019, Tropical medicine and infectious disease.

[3]  B. Hang'ombe,et al.  Sero-prevalence of Bovine Brucellosis and associated risk factors in mbeya region, Southern highlands of Tanzania. , 2018, Acta tropica.

[4]  D. Grace,et al.  Bovine brucellosis: prevalence, risk factors, economic cost and control options with particular reference to India- a review , 2018 .

[5]  S. Boqvist,et al.  Biosecurity aspects of cattle production in Western Uganda, and associations with seroprevalence of brucellosis, salmonellosis and bovine viral diarrhoea , 2017, BMC Veterinary Research.

[6]  A. Barua,et al.  Prevalence of bovine brucellosis in Assam, India , 2017 .

[7]  A. Muhammad,et al.  Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with bovine brucellosis in the Potohar Plateau, Pakistan , 2017, BMC Research Notes.

[8]  U. Magnusson,et al.  Prevalence of and factors associated with Brucella sero-positivity in cattle in urban and peri-urban Gulu and Soroti towns of Uganda , 2015, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[9]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Seroprevalence of Brucella abortus and Leptospira hardjo in cattle , 2015, Veterinary world.

[10]  S. Khairani-Bejo,et al.  A Case-Control Study of Risk Factors for Bovine Brucellosis Seropositivity in Peninsular Malaysia , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  A. B. Fulsoundar,et al.  Prevalence and risk factor's analysis of bovine brucellosis in peri-urban areas under intensive system of production in Gujarat, India. , 2014 .

[12]  U. Magnusson,et al.  Seropositivity and risk factors for Brucella in dairy cows in urban and peri-urban small-scale farming in Tajikistan , 2014, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[13]  Padma Singh,et al.  Bovine brucellosis in organized farms of India - an assessment of diagnostic assays and risk factors. , 2014 .

[14]  C. Saegerman,et al.  Seroprevalence and Potential Risk Factors for Brucella Spp. Infection in Traditional Cattle, Sheep and Goats Reared in Urban, Periurban and Rural Areas of Niger , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  D. Grace,et al.  Economics of brucellosis impact and control in low-income countries. , 2013, Revue scientifique et technique.

[16]  G. Filia,et al.  Sero – Epidemiology of Brucellosis in Organized Cattle and Buffaloes in Punjab ( India ) , 2013 .

[17]  K. Karthik,et al.  Seroprevalence studies of bovine brucellosis using indirectenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (i-ELISA) at organized and unorganized farms in three different states of India. , 2013 .

[18]  C. Saegerman,et al.  Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  M. Thrusfield,et al.  Herd prevalence of bovine brucellosis and analysis of risk factors in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas of the Kampala economic zone, Uganda , 2011, BMC veterinary research.

[20]  V. Dighe,et al.  Serodetection of bovine brucellosis by RBPT and AB-ELISA. , 2011 .

[21]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Comparison of PCR with conventional techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle , 2010 .

[22]  Y. W.L.  SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS , 2010 .

[23]  A. Verma,et al.  Prevalence of bovine brucellosis in Uttar Pradesh, India. , 2009 .

[24]  H. Kumar,et al.  A Study on the Epidemiology of Bovine Brucellosis in Punjab (India) Using Milk-ELISA , 2008 .

[25]  A. Coelho,et al.  A case-control study of risk factors for brucellosis seropositivity in Portuguese small ruminants herds. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[26]  E. Skjerve,et al.  Risk factors for brucellosis in indigenous cattle reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zambia. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[27]  D. K. Bhattacharya,et al.  Studies on sero prevalence of bovine brucellosis by different tests. , 2005 .