Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane

A widely held hypothesis of mammalian cochlear function is that the mechanical responses to sound of the basilar membrane depend on transduction by the outer hair cells. We have tested this hypothesis by studying the effect upon basilar membrane vibrations (measured by means of either the Mossbauer technique or Doppler-shift laser velocimetry) of systemic injection of furosemide, a loop diuretic that decreases transduction currents in hair cells. Furosemide reversibly altered the responses to tones and clicks of the chinchilla basilar membrane, causing response-magnitude reductions that were largest (up to 61 dB, averaging 25–30 dB) at low stimulus intensities at the characteristic frequency (CF) and small or nonexistent at high intensities and at frequencies far removed from CF. Furosemide also induced response-phase lags that were largest at low stimulus intensities (averaging 77 degrees) and were confined to frequencies close to CF. These results constitute the most definitive demonstration to date that mechanical responses of the basilar membrane are dependent on the normal function of the organ of Corti and strongly implicate the outer hair cells as being responsible for the high sensitivity and frequency selectivity of basilar membrane responses. A corollary of these findings is that sensorineural hearing deficits in humans due to outer hair cell loss reflect pathologically diminished vibrations of the basilar membrane.

[1]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Application of a commercially-manufactured Doppler-shift laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar-membrane vibration , 1991, Hearing Research.

[2]  P G Nelson,et al.  Calcium, network activity, and the role of NMDA channels in synaptic plasticity in vitro , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Application of laser velocimetry to the measurement of basilar membrane vibrations , 1990 .

[4]  D. Mountain,et al.  Haircell forward and reverse transduction: Differential suppression and enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[5]  The Basilar Membrane Nonlinear Input-Output Function , 1990 .

[6]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Systemic Injection of Furosemide Alters the Mechanical Response to Sound of the Basilar Membrane , 1990 .

[7]  M. Osborne,et al.  Effect of furosemide upon morphology of hair bundles in guinea pig cochlear hair cells. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  A. E. Hubbard,et al.  Rapid force production in the cochlea , 1989, Hearing Research.

[9]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss , 1989, Hearing Research.

[10]  L. Robles,et al.  Nonlinear Interactions in the Mechanical Response of the Cochlea to Two-Tone Stimuli , 1989 .

[11]  J. Santos-Sacchi,et al.  Whole cell currents and mechanical responses of isolated outer hair cells , 1988, Hearing Research.

[12]  P. Dallos Cochlear neurobiology: Some key experiments and concepts of the past two decades , 1988 .

[13]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Positive endocochlear potential: Mechanism of production by marginal cells of stria vascularis , 1987, Hearing Research.

[14]  J. Syka,et al.  Electrophysiological measurements of the stria vascularis potentials in vivo , 1987, Hearing Research.

[15]  J. Ashmore A fast motile response in guinea‐pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave , 1986, Hearing Research.

[17]  D. Lim,et al.  Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review , 1986, Hearing Research.

[18]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Mossbauer Measurements of the Mechanical Response to Single-Tone and Two-Tone Stimuli at the Base of the Chinchilla Cochlea , 1986 .

[20]  J. Guinan,et al.  Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[21]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Mechanosensitivity of mammalian auditory hair cells in vitro , 1986, Nature.

[22]  J. Syka,et al.  The effect of loop diuretics upon summating potentials in the guinea pig , 1985, Hearing Research.

[23]  Craig C. Bader,et al.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. , 1985, Science.

[24]  Influence of direct current on dc receptor potentials from cochlear inner hair cells in the guinea pig. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  William F. Sewell,et al.  The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats , 1984, Hearing Research.

[26]  W. F. Sewell,et al.  The relation between the endocochlear potential and spontaneous activity in auditory nerve fibres of the cat. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The alteration of the vibration of the basilar membrane produced by loud sound , 1984, Hearing Research.

[28]  P M Sellick,et al.  A comparison between basilar membrane and inner hair cell receptor potential input-output functions in the guinea pig cochlea. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  D. Mountain,et al.  Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum. , 1983, Science.

[30]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Intracellular recordings from cochlear inner hair cells: effects of stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear efferents. , 1983, Science.

[31]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[32]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Origin of the receptor potential in inner hair cells of the mammalian cochlea—evidence for Davis' theory , 1983, Nature.

[33]  Allyn E. Hubbard,et al.  Electromechanical Processes in the Cochlea , 1983 .

[34]  E. Evans,et al.  The effects of intracochlear and systemic furosemide on the properties of single cochlear nerve fibres in the cat , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  T. F. Weiss,et al.  Bidirectional transduction in vertebrate hair cells: A mechanism for coupling mechanical and electrical processes , 1982, Hearing Research.

[36]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  T. Morizono,et al.  Effect of furosemide upon endolymph potassium concentration , 1982, Hearing Research.

[38]  C D Geisler,et al.  The phases of basilar-membrane vibrations. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity , 1982, Hearing Research.

[40]  S M Khanna,et al.  Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. , 1982, Science.

[41]  L. Rybak Pathophysiology of furosemide ototoxicity. , 1982, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[42]  A. Forge,et al.  Ultrastructural and electrophysiological studies of acute ototoxic effects of furosemide. , 1982, British journal of audiology.

[43]  R. D. Brown Comparative Acute Cochlear Toxicity of Intravenous Bumetanide and Furosemide in the Purebred Beagle , 1981, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[44]  K. Göttl,et al.  Testing strategy for ototoxic side effects. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[45]  G. Leng,et al.  The effects of frusemide, bumetanide and piretanide on the quinea pig cochlea and auditory nerve. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[46]  M. Akiyoshi Effect of loop-diuretics on hair cells of the cochlea in guinea pigs. Histological and histochemical study. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[47]  J. Syka,et al.  Comparison of the effects of furosemide and ethacrynic acid upon the cochlear function in the guinea pig. , 1981, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[48]  D. Mountain,et al.  Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. , 1980, Science.

[49]  S. Bosher,et al.  The time course of the strial changes produced by intravenous furosemide , 1980, Hearing Research.

[50]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Nonlinear mechanical behaviour of the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea , 1980, Hearing Research.

[51]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  R. D. Brown,et al.  Comparative acute ototoxicity of intravenous bumetanide and furosemide in the pure-bred beagle. , 1979, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[53]  B. Mirkin,et al.  Elimination kinetics of furosemide in perilymph and serum of the chinchilla. Neuropharmacologic correlates. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[54]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  P M Sellick,et al.  Intracellular studies of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  E. de Boer,et al.  On cochlear encoding: potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  C D Geisler,et al.  Transient response of the basilar membrane measured in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer effect. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  S. Brusilow Propranolol antagonism to the effect of furosemide on the compostion of endolymph in guinea pigs. , 1976, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[59]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  P. Federspil,et al.  Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Ototoxicität des Furosemids , 1973 .

[61]  P. A. Mattis,et al.  Cochlear microphonic potential response of the dog to diuretic compounds. , 1973, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[62]  William S. Rhode,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF POST-MORTEM COCHLEAR MECHANICS USING THE MÖSSBAUER EFFECT , 1973 .

[63]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal Position of Discharges in Single Auditory Nerve Fibers within the Cycle of a Sine‐Wave Stimulus: Frequency and Intensity Effects , 1971 .

[64]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sine-wave stimulus: frequency and intensity effects. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  W. Hudson,et al.  Ototoxicity of new and potent diuretics. A preliminary study. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.

[67]  D. C. Teas,et al.  Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. II. Interaction of electrical polarization and acoustic stimulation. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  V. Honrubia,et al.  Dependence of the cochlear microphonics and the summating potential on the endocochlear potential. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[70]  H. Davis,et al.  A model for transducer action in the cochlea. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[71]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Stria vascularis as source of endocochlear potential. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  H. Davis,et al.  Exploration of Cochlear Potentials in Guinea Pig with a Microelectrode , 1954 .

[73]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potentials by KC1 solution and by direct currents. , 1952, Journal of neurophysiology.