Objective assessment of corneal transparency in the clinical setting with standard SD-OCT devices

PURPOSE: To develop an automated algorithm allowing extraction of quantitative corneal transparency parameters from clinical spectral-domain OCT images. To establish a representative dataset of normative transparency values from healthy corneas. METHODS: SD-OCT images of 83 normal corneas (ages 22–50 years) from a standard clinical device (RTVue-XR Avanti, Optovue Inc.) were processed. A pre-processing procedure is applied first, including a derivative approach and a PCA-based correction mask, to eliminate common central artifacts (i.e., apex-centered column saturation artifact and posterior stromal artifact) and enable standardized analysis. The mean intensity stromal-depth profile is then extracted over a 6-mm-wide corneal area and analyzed according to our previously developed method deriving quantitative transparency parameters related to the physics of light propagation in tissues, notably tissular heterogeneity (Birge ratio; Br), followed by the photon mean-free path (ls) in homogeneous tissues (i.e., Br~1). RESULTS: After confirming stromal homogeneity (Br < 10, IDR: 1.9–5.1), we measured a median ls of 570 μm (IDR: 270–2400 μm). Considering corneal thicknesses, this may be translated into a median fraction of transmitted (coherent) light Tcoh(stroma) of 51% (IDR: 22–83%). No statistically significant correlation between transparency and age or thickness was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm provides robust and quantitative measurement of corneal transparency from standard clinical SD-OCT images. It yields lower transparency values than previously reported, which may be attributed to our method being exclusively sensitive to spatially coherent light. Excluding images with central artifacts wider than 300 μm also raises our median Tcoh(stroma) to 70% (IDR: 34– 87%).

[1]  C. Baudouin,et al.  Evaluation of corneal stromal changes in vivo after laser in situ keratomileusis with confocal microscopy. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[2]  S. Jain,et al.  Objective measurement of corneal light scattering after excimer laser keratectomy. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Peyrot,et al.  Wavelength optimization in femtosecond laser corneal surgery. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Karsten Plamann,et al.  Effect of incident light wavelength and corneal edema on light scattering and penetration: laboratory study of human corneas. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  Romain Bocheux,et al.  Quantitative measures of corneal transparency, derived from objective analysis of depth-resolved corneal images, demonstrated with full-field optical coherence tomographic microscopy , 2019, PloS one.

[6]  G. Timberlake,et al.  Corneal light scattering after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy: the objective measurements of haze. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[7]  T. J. T. P. Van Den Berg,et al.  Light transmittance of the human cornea from 320 to 700 nm for different ages , 1994, Vision Research.

[8]  C. van de Pol,et al.  Objective assessment of transient corneal haze and its relation to visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[10]  Lucas Ramos De Pretto,et al.  Enhance resolution on OCT profilometry measurements using harmonic artifacts , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[11]  J. V. van Best,et al.  Light transmission of the cornea in whole human eyes. , 1990, Experimental eye research.

[12]  Joseph A. Izatt,et al.  Robust automatic segmentation of corneal layer boundaries in SDOCT images using graph theory and dynamic programming , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[13]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[14]  J. L. Poulsen,et al.  Central corneal thickness is highly heritable: the twin eye studies. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  David Mas,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness using SOCT Copernicus HR , 2013, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[16]  S. Lerman,et al.  Biophysical aspects of corneal and lenticular transparency. , 1984, Current eye research.

[17]  Ashesh A. Shah,et al.  Birefringence of the central cornea in children assessed with scanning laser polarimetry. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  C. Bader,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Central and Peripheral Corneal Thickness: Determination of Normal Values With the Orbscan II Topography System , 2007, Cornea.

[19]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Grading of corneal transparency. , 2004, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[20]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  G O Waring,et al.  Wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis (photorefractive keratectomy) in monkeys. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  Edward A. Boettner,et al.  Transmission of the Ocular Media , 1962 .

[23]  Romain Bocheux,et al.  Objective and quantitative analysis of corneal transparency with clinical spectral-domain optical coherence tomography , 2019, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.