Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: The effects of three group goal-setting strategies

An experiment was conducted with 30 groups (n = 120) solving brainstorming tasks under four different group goal conditions: do your best (DYB), directive group goal setting (DGGS), participative group goal setting (PGGS), and PGGS in combination with individual goal setting (PGGS + IGS). As expected, all groups with specific and difficult group goals performed better than DYB control groups. It is hypothesized that these positive effects of group goal setting on brainstorming performance arise because group goal setting counteracts motivation losses such as social loafing. In addition, group goal setting should promote motivation gains arising from social compensation and related cognitive processes, in particular high identification with the group. Consistent with this hypothesis, it was found that group goal setting increased team identification, the readiness to compensate for other weak group members, the value of group success, and the value of group failure. Mediation analysis also indicated that concern to avoid group failure was partly responsible for performance improvements. Finally, no large differences were found between PGGS + IGS and PGGS or DGGS. On this basis group goal setting can be considered a robust strategy for improving work motivation and brainstorming performance in groups.

[1]  L. Weingart,et al.  Group goals and group performance , 1993 .

[2]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[3]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effects of Group Goals and Time Pressure on Group Efficacy, Information-Seeking Strategy, and Performance , 2000 .

[5]  Guido Hertel.  Editorial: Motivation Gains in Groups: A Brief Review of the State of the Art , 2000 .

[6]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[9]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[10]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .

[11]  R. Peterson.  Can You have too Much of a Good Thing? The Limits of Voice for Improving Satisfaction with Leaders , 1999 .

[12]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[13]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  How a group goal may reduce social matching in group performance: shifts in standards for determining a fair contribution of effort. , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.

[14]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  Yours, Mine, and Ours: Facilitating Group Productivity through the Integration of Individual and Group Goals , 1995 .

[15]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[16]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[17]  S. Haslam,et al.  The ASPIRe model: Actualizing Social and Personal Identity Resources to enhance organizational outcomes. , 2003 .

[18]  D. Tjosvold.  Conflict Over the Study of Conflict: The Challenge to Make it Cooperative , 1998 .

[19]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social Identity, Self-categorization, and Work Motivation: Rethinking the Contribution of the Group to Positive and Sustainable Organisational Outcomes , 2000 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. , 2000 .

[22]  Michael A. West,et al.  Team Effectiveness in Organizations , 1998 .

[23]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. , 1993 .

[24]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[25]  Juergen Wegge,et al.  Participation in Group Goal Setting: Some Novel Findings and a Comprehensive Model as a New Ending to an Old Story , 2000 .

[26]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  How a Group Goal May Reduce Social Matching in Group Performance: Shifts in Standards for Determining a Fair Contribution of Effort , 2002 .

[27]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[28]  E. Day,et al.  Social identity and individual productivity within groups. , 1998, The British journal of social psychology.

[29]  N. Ellemers,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTITY IN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS , 2006 .

[30]  D. Chan.  The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staff, Motivation, and Development , 2001 .

[31]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Interrater reliability coefficients cannot be computed when only one stimulus is rated. , 1989 .

[32]  E. Weldon,et al.  Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Social Compensation and the Köhler Effect: Toward a Theoretical Explanation of Motivation Gains in Group Productivity , 2018, Understanding Group Behavior.

[34]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[35]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez–Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. , 1988 .

[36]  Y. Fried,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[37]  Anit Somech,et al.  Is Group Productivity Loss the Rule or The Exception? Effects of Culture and Group-Based Motivation , 1996 .

[38]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[39]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  S. Karau,et al.  Group cohesiveness and social loafing: Effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. , 1998 .

[41]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[42]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  L. Thompson,et al.  Improving the creativity of organizational work groups , 2003 .

[44]  N. Ellemers,et al.  MOTIVATING INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS AT WORK : A SOCIAL IDENTITY PERSPECTIVE ON LEADERSHIP AND GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[45]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement , 2000 .

[46]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Goal Setting by Groups Performing an Additive Task: A Comparison With Individual Goal Setting1 , 1995 .

[48]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[49]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  W. Widmeyer,et al.  Team building through team goal setting , 1997 .

[51]  Lynda Holyoak,et al.  Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach , 2002 .

[52]  N. Kerr.  Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[53]  J. Crocker,et al.  A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity , 1992 .

[54]  Abraham Sagie,et al.  Effects of Leader's Communication Style and Participative Goal Setting on Performance and Attitudes , 1996 .

[55]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[56]  L. Weingart.  Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[57]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[58]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  The effects of facilitators on the performance of brainstorming groups , 1996 .

[59]  Andrew G. Livingstone,et al.  Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  Klaus-Helmut Schmidt Uwe Kleinbeck.  Relationships Between Group-based Performance Measures, Feedback, and Organizational Context Factors , 1997 .

[61]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[62]  P. Paulus.  Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups , 2000 .

[63]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[64]  Tamao Matsui,et al.  Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. , 1987 .

[65]  Harrie van Tuijl,et al.  Task complexity and task, goal, and reward interdependence in group performance management: A prescriptive model , 2002 .

[66]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Sticking to our guns : social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects , 2006 .

[67]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social and Cognitive Influences in Group Brainstorming: Predicting Production Gains and Losses , 2002 .

[68]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. , 1997 .

[69]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[70]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Relationship of Goal Level to Valence and Instrumentality , 1992 .

[71]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .