Mechanistic models of cell-fate transitions from single-cell data

Abstract Our knowledge of how individual cells self-organize to form complex multicellular systems is being revolutionized by a data outburst, coming from high-throughput experimental breakthroughs such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatially resolved single-molecule FISH. This information is starting to be leveraged by machine learning approaches that are helping us establish a census and timeline of cell types in developing organisms, shedding light on how biochemistry regulates cell-fate decisions. In parallel, imaging tools such as light-sheet microscopy are revealing how cells self-assemble in space and time as the organism forms, thereby elucidating the role of cell mechanics in development. Here we argue that mathematical modeling can bring together these two perspectives, by enabling us to test hypotheses about specific mechanisms, which can be further validated experimentally. We review the recent literature on this subject, focusing on representative examples that use modeling to better understand how single-cell behavior shapes multicellular organisms.

[1]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[2]  Sascha Jung,et al.  The Importance of Computational Modeling in Stem Cell Research. , 2020, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process , 2016, PLoS biology.

[4]  Michael P.H. Stumpf,et al.  Repeated Decision Stumping Distils Simple Rules from Single Cell Data , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  F. Crauste,et al.  Drugs modulating stochastic gene expression affect the erythroid differentiation process , 2019, PloS one.

[6]  Alexey M. Kozlov,et al.  Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science , 2020, Genome Biology.

[7]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling , 2019, Nature Methods.

[8]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Stem cell differentiation as a many-body problem , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Deanna M. Church,et al.  The emergent landscape of the mouse gut endoderm at single-cell resolution , 2019, Nature.

[10]  A. M. Arias,et al.  Transition states and cell fate decisions in epigenetic landscapes , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  Michel C. Milinkovitch,et al.  A living mesoscopic cellular automaton made of skin scales , 2017, Nature.

[12]  Hervé Rouault,et al.  Self-organized Notch dynamics generate stereotyped sensory organ patterns in Drosophila , 2017, Mechanisms of Development.

[13]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  Topological sensitivity analysis for systems biology , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Katherine A. Heller,et al.  Massive computational acceleration by using neural networks to emulate mechanism-based biological models , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  S. Grill,et al.  Guiding self-organized pattern formation in cell polarity establishment , 2018, Nature Physics.

[16]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal somitogenesis in gastruloids , 2020, Nature.

[17]  Joerg Stelling,et al.  Multistable and dynamic CRISPRi-based synthetic circuits , 2020, Nature Communications.

[18]  Jin Wang,et al.  Quantifying Cell Fate Decisions for Differentiation and Reprogramming of a Human Stem Cell Network: Landscape and Biological Paths , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  John J Tyson,et al.  A Dynamical Paradigm for Molecular Cell Biology. , 2020, Trends in cell biology.

[20]  Quantifying cell transitions in C. elegans with data-fitted landscape models , 2021 .

[21]  Francis Corson,et al.  Gene-free methodology for cell fate dynamics during development , 2017, eLife.

[22]  Tina Toni,et al.  Parameter inference for biochemical systems that undergo a Hopf bifurcation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Machine Learning of Stem Cell Identities From Single-Cell Expression Data via Regulatory Network Archetypes , 2019, Front. Genet..

[24]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[25]  Hans Clevers,et al.  What Is Your Conceptual Definition of "Cell Type" in the Context of a Mature Organism? , 2017, Cell systems.

[26]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[27]  Sean G. Megason,et al.  Mathematically guided approaches to distinguish models of periodic patterning , 2015, Development.

[28]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution , 2019, Science.

[29]  A. Turing The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1990 .

[30]  Ben D. MacArthur,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Pluripotency , 2013, Cell.

[31]  J. Sharpe,et al.  Positional information and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine , 2015, Development.

[32]  R. Baker,et al.  Mechanistic models versus machine learning, a fight worth fighting for the biological community? , 2018, Biology Letters.

[33]  Guo-Cheng Yuan,et al.  Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH+ , 2019, Nature.

[34]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition , 2016, bioRxiv.

[35]  J. García-Ojalvo,et al.  Towards a statistical mechanics of cell fate decisions. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[36]  Leonardo Beccari,et al.  Multi-axial self-organization properties of mouse embryonic stem cells into gastruloids , 2018, Nature.

[37]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[38]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  The dynamics of gene expression in vertebrate embryogenesis at single-cell resolution , 2018, Science.

[39]  A. Turing The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[40]  Sui Huang The Tension Between Big Data and Theory in the "Omics" Era of Biomedical Research , 2019, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[41]  F. Corson,et al.  Self-Organization in Pattern Formation. , 2019, Developmental cell.

[42]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  Circuit-level input integration in bacterial gene regulation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  T. M. Murali,et al.  Benchmarking algorithms for gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomic data , 2020, Nature Methods.

[44]  Growth-factor-mediated coupling between lineage size and cell fate choice underlies robustness of mammalian development , 2020, eLife.

[45]  Mark K. Transtrum,et al.  Rational Ignorance: Simpler Models Learn More Information from Finite Data , 2017, 1705.01166.

[46]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[47]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Stem Cell Differentiation as a Non-Markov Stochastic Process , 2017, Cell systems.

[48]  Fabian Rudolf,et al.  A rationally engineered decoder of transient intracellular signals , 2021, Nature Communications.

[49]  Sonja Nowotschin,et al.  Symmetry breaking, germ layer specification and axial organisation in aggregates of mouse embryonic stem cells , 2014, Development.

[50]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Models of stochastic gene expression , 2005 .

[51]  Paul François,et al.  Untangling the Hairball: Fitness-Based Asymptotic Reduction of Biological Networks. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[52]  A. Minelli,et al.  Towards a Theory of Development , 2014 .

[53]  E. Siggia,et al.  A quantitative landscape of cell fate transitions identifies principles of cellular decision-making , 2021, bioRxiv.