Automatic analysis of slides processed in the Comet assay.

In recent years the Comet assay (or single cell gel electrophoresis assay) has been established as a rapid and sensitive method for the detection of DNA damage. For early genotoxicity screening of new chemical entities in industrial toxicology, the Comet assay is more and more used for assessment of the DNA damaging potential of a test compound. In order to increase compound screening throughput, we have established an image analysis system for fully automated measurement of microscope slides processed in the Comet assay. For the comparative investigation various cell types, such as V79 Chinese hamster cells, mouse lymphoma cells and human leukocytes, were treated with several test compounds. Using tail moment as the quantitative parameter for comet formation, we show a very high correlation between our automatic image analysis system and a commercially available, interactive system (Comet Assay II of Perceptive Instruments). The possibility of analyzing 50 samples within 1 day and the high reproducibility of results make automated image processing a powerful tool for automatic analysis of slides processed in the Comet assay.

[1]  W Böcker,et al.  Automated comet assay analysis. , 1999, Cytometry.

[2]  E. Kiskinis,et al.  Use of the alkaline comet assay for industrial genotoxicity screening: comparative investigation with the micronucleus test. , 2001, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  Diana Anderson,et al.  Comet assay responses as indicators of carcinogen exposure. , 1998, Mutagenesis.

[4]  P. Olive,et al.  The comet assay: a comprehensive review. , 1995, Mutation research.

[5]  J. Serra Introduction to mathematical morphology , 1986 .

[6]  J Ashby,et al.  The single cell gel electrophoresis assay for induced DNA damage (comet assay): measurement of tail length and moment. , 1995, Mutagenesis.

[7]  B. Ames,et al.  Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. , 1983, Mutation research.

[8]  P. Olive,et al.  Detection of etoposide resistance by measuring DNA damage in individual Chinese hamster cells. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  R. Tice,et al.  Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[10]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[11]  J. Nygren,et al.  The comet assay: mechanisms and technical considerations. , 1996, Mutation research.

[12]  S. Pfuhler,et al.  Exercise-induced DNA effects in human leukocytes are not accompanied by increased formation of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine or induction of micronuclei. , 1998, Free radical biology & medicine.

[13]  W Frieauff,et al.  Automatic analysis of the in vitro micronucleus test on V79 cells. , 1998, Mutation research.

[14]  G. Speit,et al.  The contribution of cytotoxicity to DNA-effects in the single cell gel test (comet assay). , 1997, Toxicology letters.

[15]  W Böcker,et al.  A fast autofocus unit for fluorescence microscopy. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Pedersen,et al.  Modification of the Comet assay for the detection of DNA strand breaks in extremely small tissue samples. , 1999, Mutagenesis.

[17]  P. Olive,et al.  Cell proliferation as a requirement for development of the contact effect in Chinese hamster V79 spheroids. , 1989, Radiation research.

[18]  W Böcker,et al.  Image analysis of comet assay measurements. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.