Costs and benefits of nitrogen for Europe and implications for mitigation.

Cost-benefit analysis can be used to provide guidance for emerging policy priorities in reducing nitrogen (N) pollution. This paper provides a critical and comprehensive assessment of costs and benefits of the various flows of N on human health, ecosystems and climate stability in order to identify major options for mitigation. The social cost of impacts of N in the EU27 in 2008 was estimated between €75-485 billion per year. A cost share of around 60% is related to emissions to air. The share of total impacts on human health is about 45% and may reflect the higher willingness to pay for human health than for ecosystems or climate stability. Air pollution by nitrogen also generates social benefits for climate by present cooling effects of N containing aerosol and C-sequestration driven by N deposition, amounting to an estimated net benefit of about €5 billion/yr. The economic benefit of N in primary agricultural production ranges between €20-80 billion/yr and is lower than the annual cost of pollution by agricultural N which is in the range of €35-230 billion/yr. Internalizing these environmental costs would lower the optimum annual N-fertilization rate in Northwestern Europe by about 50 kg/ha. Acknowledging the large uncertainties and conceptual issues of our cost-benefit estimates, the results support the priority for further reduction of NH3 and NOx emissions from transport and agriculture beyond commitments recently agreed in revision of the Gothenburg Protocol.

[1]  A. Kirkevåg,et al.  Transboundary acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe in 2011 , 2013 .

[2]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Management, regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under the Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study , 2012 .

[3]  Tong Zhu,et al.  Association between changes in air pollution levels during the Beijing Olympics and biomarkers of inflammation and thrombosis in healthy young adults. , 2012, JAMA.

[4]  Jens Borken-Kleefeld,et al.  Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Markus Amann,et al.  Ammonia Reductions and Costs Implied By the Three Ambition Levels Proposed in the Draft Annex IX to the Gothenburg Protocol , 2011 .

[6]  Jan H. Janse,et al.  The protein puzzle: the consumption and production of meat, dairy and fish in the European Union. , 2011 .

[7]  Zbigniew Klimont,et al.  Integrated Ammonia Abatement - Modelling of Emission Control Potentials and Costs in GAINS , 2011 .

[8]  Cost-effective emission reductions to improve air quality in Europe in 2020: Analysis of policy options for the EU for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol , 2011 .

[9]  Elke Stehfest,et al.  Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Dominique Ami,et al.  Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY) , 2011 .

[11]  Lutz Breuer,et al.  The European Nitrogen Assessment , 2011 .

[12]  Ing-Marie Gren,et al.  The European Nitrogen Assessment: Costs and benefits of nitrogen in the environment , 2011 .

[13]  Adrian Leip,et al.  Nitrogen in Current European Policies , 2011 .

[14]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  Nitrogen as a threat to the European greenhouse balance , 2011 .

[15]  J. F. Zevenbergen,et al.  Benefits of nitrogen for food, fibre and industrial production , 2011 .

[16]  D. Simpson,et al.  The European Nitrogen Assessment: Nitrogen as a threat to European air quality , 2011 .

[17]  Carson J. Reeling,et al.  Why metrics matter: evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[19]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world , 2008 .

[20]  J. Galloway,et al.  Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions , 2008, Science.

[21]  H. Kage,et al.  Impact of uncertainty on the optimum nitrogen fertilization rate and agronomic, ecological and economic factors in an oilseed rape based crop rotation , 2007, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[22]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[23]  Richard Reiss,et al.  Evidence of Health Impacts of Sulfate-and Nitrate-Containing Particles in Ambient Air , 2007, Inhalation toxicology.

[24]  A. Rabl,et al.  Damage costs of nitrogen fertilizer in Europe and their internalization , 2006 .

[25]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Thinking broadly about costs and benefits in ecological management. , 2006, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[26]  Glenn Sheriff,et al.  Efficient Waste? Why Farmers Over-Apply Nutrients and the Implications for Policy Design , 2005 .

[27]  P. Barraclough,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems , 2004 .

[28]  D. B. Nedwell,et al.  Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  V. Smil.  Eating Meat: Evolution, Patterns, and Consequences , 2002 .

[30]  V. Smil.  Nitrogen and Food Production: Proteins for Human Diets , 2002, Ambio.

[31]  Mike Holland,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Development of Acidification Policy in Europe , 2001 .

[32]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? , 1999, Oper. Res..