Tracking by local collaborative representation

This paper proposes an object tracking method based on local collaborative representation. In this method, local image patches of an object are represented by collaborative vectors with an over-complete dictionary and a classifier is learned to discriminate the target object from the background. To deal with the changes of both the target object and the background during tracking, we update the dictionary and classifier with new observations obtained online. Compared to the recent tracking algorithms based on sparse representation, the collaborative representation method is also effective yet much more efficient. Furthermore, collaborative representation based on local image patches and the discrimination formulation the proposed algorithm employs can deal with complex environments better than the sparse representation-based tracking methods which use holistic object appearance within a generative framework. Experiments on lots of challenging video sequences with comparison to several state-of-the-art methods show the favorable performance of our algorithm.

[1]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Visual tracking with online Multiple Instance Learning , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Robust and Fast Collaborative Tracking with Two Stage Sparse Optimization , 2010, ECCV.

[3]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Robust visual tracking using ℓ1 minimization , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  Yanxi Liu,et al.  Online Selection of Discriminative Tracking Features , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Junseok Kwon,et al.  Visual tracking decomposition , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Robust tracking using local sparse appearance model and K-selection , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[8]  Shai Avidan,et al.  Ensemble Tracking , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Horst Bischof,et al.  On-line Boosting and Vision , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[10]  Michael Isard,et al.  CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Robust Visual Tracking using 1 Minimization , 2009 .

[12]  Michael J. Black,et al.  EigenTracking: Robust Matching and Tracking of Articulated Objects Using a View-Based Representation , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Shai Avidan,et al.  Support Vector Tracking , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[14]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition? , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[15]  Jiri Matas,et al.  P-N learning: Bootstrapping binary classifiers by structural constraints , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  An experimental comparison of online object-tracking algorithms , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  Ming-Hsuan Yang,et al.  Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.