Weed control in conventional and herbicide tolerant winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) grown in rotations with winter cereals in the UK

Two winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus) cultivars, tolerant to glyphosate and glufosinate, were compared with a conventional cultivar at three sites over 4 years, in 3-year crop rotations in the UK. The winter oilseed rape was grown in Years 1 and 4, with winter cereals, which received uniform herbicide treatments, in the intervening years. The second winter oilseed rape treatments were applied to randomised sub-plots of the original plots. Weed densities were recorded in autumn and spring and weed biomass was measured in summer. At most sites, there was only one application of glufosinate or glyphosate, whereas two products were often used on the conventional variety. The timing of glyphosate and glufosinate application was, on average, 34 days later than that of the conventional broad-leaved weed control treatments. Overall weed control, across all sites and years, was not statistically different between the conventional, glyphosate and glufosinate treatments. However, glyphosate achieved higher control of individual weed species more frequently than the other treatments. Glufosinate and the conventional treatments were similar in performance. The treatments in Year 1 sometimes affected weed populations in the subsequent cereal crops and, in rare instances, those in the rape in Year 4. Carry-over effects were small after most treatments. In general, weed survival was greater in the oilseed rape crops, irrespective of the treatment, than it was in the intervening cereal crops.

[1]  R. Blackshaw,et al.  Comparison of a Glyphosate-Resistant Canola (Brassica napus L.) System with Traditional Herbicide Regimes1 , 2006, Weed Technology.

[2]  D. Wall,et al.  Herbicide-tolerant canola: weed control and yield comparisons in western Canada. , 2000 .

[3]  P. Lutman Estimation of seed production by Stellaria media, Sinapis arvensis and Tripleurospermum inodorum in arable crops , 2002 .

[4]  Cathy Hawes,et al.  Effects on weed and invertebrate abundance and diversity of herbicide management in genetically modified herbicide-tolerant winter-sown oilseed rape , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  R. Blackshaw,et al.  Herbicide Timing and Rate Effects on Weed Management in Three Herbicide-Resistant Canola Systems1 , 2004, Weed Technology.

[6]  Mike J. May,et al.  An introduction to the Farm‐Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide‐tolerant crops , 2003 .

[7]  M. Hill,et al.  Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  P. Raymer,et al.  Herbicide-Resistant Canola (Brassica napus) Response and Weed Control with Postemergence Herbicides1 , 2006, Weed Technology.

[9]  N. Boatman,et al.  Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  David A. Bohan,et al.  On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  T. Loughin,et al.  Efficacy of glyphosate, glufosinate, and imazethapyr on selected weed species , 2003, Weed Science.

[12]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain , 2002 .