Developing Learning Objects for Secondary School Students: A Multi-Component Model

Previous research on the development of learning objects have three notable characteristics: a focus on either technical or learning features, but not both, a target audience consisting exclusively of higher education students, and the absence of formal evaluation. This study provides a detailed description and formal evaluation of a multi-component model used to develop five learning objects for secondary school students. Overall, two thirds of the students reported that the learning objects were beneficial, citing a motivating theme, interactivity, and visual qualities as the most important features. However, almost 60% of all students were critical about the learning object quality. Clarity of instructions, help functions and organization/layout presented the most problems. While the development model used in the study emphasized both technical and learning components, the latter was far more important to teachers and students. Key steps that appeared to be beneficial in the development process included a collaborative team approach, understanding the learner, a focus on clear instruction and organization, and using a comprehensive, theoretically supported evaluation metric to examine the quality and benefits of learning objects.

[1]  Rory McGreal,et al.  Learning objects: A practical definition , 2004 .

[2]  Barry Harper,et al.  Developing a learning object metadata application profile based on LOM suitable for the Australian higher education context , 2004 .

[3]  Allison Druin,et al.  The design of children's technology , 1998 .

[4]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Domain-Generality versus Domain-Specificity: The Life and Impending Death of a False Dichotomy. , 1989 .

[5]  Tim Oren Cognitive load in Hypermedia: designing for the exploratory learner , 1990 .

[6]  Anita Petrinjak,et al.  Creating Learning Objects from Pre-Authored Course Materials:Semantic Structure of Learning Objects — Design and Technology , 2004 .

[7]  Claire Bradley,et al.  The Design, Development, and Use of Multimedia Learning Objects , 2004 .

[8]  David A. Wiley,et al.  The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version , 2000 .

[9]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Preservice Primary Teachers' Thinking About Technology and Technology Education , 2000 .

[10]  Patrick E. Parrish,et al.  The trouble with learning objects , 2004 .

[11]  Kamran Sedighian Interface style, flow, and reflective cognition : issues in designing interactive multimedia mathematics learning environments for children , 1998 .

[12]  Mohamed Ally,et al.  A Study of the Design and Evaluation of a Learning Object and Implications for Content Development , 2005 .

[13]  Tom Boyle,et al.  Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects , 2003, ASCILITE.

[14]  George Gadanidis,et al.  Factors Mediating the use of Online Applets in the Lesson Planning of Pre-service Mathematics Teachers , 2003 .

[15]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[16]  David Wiley,et al.  Overcoming the Limitations of Learning Objects , 2004 .

[17]  M. J. Atkins Theories of learning and multimedia applications: an overview , 1993 .

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[19]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[20]  J. Bruner Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language , 1985 .

[21]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Learning to use a word processor: by doing, by thinking, and by knowing , 1984 .

[22]  Sean W. M. Siqueira,et al.  Increasing the Semantics of Learning Objects , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Process. Orient. Lang..

[23]  Gilbert Paquette,et al.  Organic Aggregation of Knowledge Object in Educational Systems , 2002 .

[24]  Robin Mason,et al.  Keeping the learning in learning objects , 2003 .

[25]  Marshall G. Jones,et al.  Using Metacognitive Theories to Design User Interfaces for Computer-Based Learning. , 1995 .

[26]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Edusource: Canada's Learning Object Repository Network , 2004 .

[27]  Andrew S. Gibbons and Jon Nelson and Robert Richards,et al.  The nature and origin of instructional objects , 2000 .

[28]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Issues in reusing online resources , 2003 .

[29]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[30]  Terrie Lynn Thompson,et al.  Addressing the eLearning Contradiction: A Collaborative Approach for Developing a Conceptual Framework Learning Object , 2005 .

[31]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[32]  Licia Calvi Navigation and disorientation: a case study , 1997 .

[33]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[34]  Madhumita,et al.  Twenty-one Guidelines for Effective Instructional Design. , 1995 .

[35]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[36]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Human factors in computer systems , 1984 .

[37]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  The role of usability research in designing children's computer products , 1998 .

[38]  Lynda R. Wiest The Role of Computers in Mathematics Teaching and Learning , 2001 .

[39]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[40]  Russell Butson,et al.  Learning objects: weapons of mass instruction , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  Maria M. Klawe,et al.  Computer Games, Education and Interfaces: The E-GEMS Project , 1999, Graphics Interface.

[42]  Diana Laurillard Design tools for e-learning , 2002, ASCILITE.

[43]  Erik Duval,et al.  Learning Objects Symposium Special Issue Guest Editorial , 2004 .

[44]  David M. Kennedy,et al.  Design elements for interactive multimedia , 1997 .

[45]  David L. Ryan-Jones,et al.  Designing Instruction with Learning Objects. , 2002 .

[46]  Thomas Cochrane,et al.  Interactive QuickTime: Developing and Evaluating Multimedia Learning Objects to Enhance Both Face-To-Face and Distance E-Learning Environments , 2004 .

[47]  Martyn Wild,et al.  Motivation and interface design: maximising learning opportunities , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[48]  Lúcia Blondet Baruque,et al.  Learning Theory and Instructional Design Using Learning Object , 2022 .

[49]  Marianne Acovelli,et al.  A Coaching Agent for Learners Using Multimedia Simulations. , 1997 .

[50]  Katina Zammit,et al.  Computer Icons: A Picture Says a Thousand Words. Or Does It? , 2000 .

[51]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Designing a Hypermedia Tool for Learning about Children's Mathematical Cognition , 1998 .

[52]  Robin Kay A Systematic Evaluation of Learning Objects for Secondary School Students , 2007 .

[53]  Orit Zeichner,et al.  Using Technology to Enhance Mathematical Reasoning: Effects of Feedback and Self-Regulation Learning , 2001 .

[54]  Susan E. Metros Visualizing knowledge in new educational environments: a course on learning objects , 2005 .

[55]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Interactivity of Visual Mathematical Representations: Factors Affecting Learning and Cognitive Processes , 2006 .

[56]  J. Bruner Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[57]  Roger Mundell,et al.  Experiences with reusable E-learning objects: From theory to practice , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[58]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[59]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[60]  Yavuz Akpinar,et al.  Designing interactive learning environments , 1996 .

[61]  Vicki Compton,et al.  Enhancing Technological Practice: An Assessment Framework for Technology Education in New Zealand , 2003 .

[62]  Norm Friesen,et al.  What are Educational Objects? , 2001, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[63]  Laurie Lewis,et al.  Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2002. E.D. Tabs. , 2002 .

[64]  Pithamber R. Polsani,et al.  Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..