Finding the optimal combination of power plants alternatives: A multi response Taguchi-neural network using TOPSIS and fuzzy best-worst method

With increasing growth of electricity consumption in developed and developing countries, the necessity of constructing and developing of power plants is inevitable. There are two main resources for electricity generation includes fossil and renewable energies which have some different characteristics such as manufacturing technology, environmental issues, accessibility and etc. In developing plans, it is important to consider and address the policy makers’ indicators such as environmental, social, economic and technical criteria. In this paper, an integrated multi response Taguchi-neural network-fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM) -TOPSIS approach is applied to find an optimal level of five different power plants including: gas, steam, combined cycle, wind and hydroelectric. Taguchi method is used to design combinations and calculate some of the signal to noise (S/N) ratios. Then, neural network is applied to estimate the rest of S/N ratios. Finally, FBWM and TOPSIS methods are used for weighing sub-indicators and selecting the best combination, respectively. To illustrate the usefulness of the proposed approach, a case study on the development of power plants in Iran is considered and the results are discussed. According to the results, in general, small size power plants for fossil resources are preferable. In contrast, medium and larger size power plants for renewable resources are preferable.

[1]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: an application in power plants Malmquist Luenberger Index , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Li Li,et al.  A method integrating Taguchi, RSM and MOPSO to CNC machining parameters optimization for energy saving , 2016 .

[3]  Murat Sarıkaya,et al.  Multi-response optimization of minimum quantity lubrication parameters using Taguchi-based grey relational analysis in turning of difficult-to-cut alloy Haynes 25 , 2015 .

[4]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Decision support systems for power plants impact on the living standard , 2012 .

[5]  Jooh Lee,et al.  Two-stage production modeling of large U.S. banks: A DEA-neural network approach , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[7]  Tej Singh,et al.  Hybrid entropy – TOPSIS approach for energy performance prioritization in a rectangular channel employing impinging air jets , 2017 .

[8]  Yi Zeng,et al.  Multifactor-influenced energy consumption forecasting using enhanced back-propagation neural network , 2017 .

[9]  Mark E. Schaffer,et al.  Economic development and the demand for energy: A historical perspective on the next 20 years , 2012 .

[10]  Itziar Cabanes,et al.  High-accuracy wire electrical discharge machining using artificial neural networks and optimization techniques , 2018 .

[11]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. , 2011 .

[12]  G. Büyüközkan,et al.  An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey , 2016 .

[13]  J. Rezaei.  Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[14]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016 , 2018 .

[15]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[16]  Ediz Atmaca,et al.  Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP) , 2012 .

[17]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey , 2017 .

[18]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[19]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015 , 2017 .

[20]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[21]  T. Daim,et al.  Selection of Renewable Energy Technologies for a Developing County: A Case of Pakistan , 2011 .

[22]  M. Kabak,et al.  Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology , 2014 .

[23]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A combined neural network and DEA for measuring efficiency of large scale datasets , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[24]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method , 2017 .

[25]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania , 2016 .

[26]  R. Kothari,et al.  Waste-to-energy: A way from renewable energy sources to sustainable development , 2010 .

[27]  K. P. Sudheer,et al.  Potential application of wavelet neural network ensemble to forecast streamflow for flood management , 2016 .

[28]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: An improved multi-criteria decision making method , 2015 .

[29]  Seyed Amin Seyed Haeri,et al.  Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique , 2017 .

[30]  Gökay Akkaya,et al.  An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Alejandro López,et al.  Combination of image processing and artificial neural networks as a novel approach for the identification of Bemisia tabaci and Frankliniella occidentalis on sticky traps in greenhouse agriculture , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[32]  Lóránt Tavasszy,et al.  Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method , 2017 .

[33]  Sen Guo,et al.  Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[34]  Meysam Alizamir,et al.  Appraisal of artificial neural network for forecasting of economic parameters , 2017 .

[35]  Behrouz Arabi,et al.  Power Industry Restructuring and Eco-Efficiency Changes: A New Slacks-Based Model in Malmquist- Luenberger Index Measurement , 2014 .

[36]  Hristos Karahalios,et al.  The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators , 2017 .

[37]  Ting Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China , 2018 .

[38]  Bilge Bilgen,et al.  An integrated fuzzy QFD and TOPSIS methodology for choosing the ideal gas fuel at WWTPs , 2017 .

[39]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Neural networks for computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: A review , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[40]  Farivar Fazelpour,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis of different types of existing power plants in Iran: An optimized energy planning system , 2018 .

[41]  Samuel Yousefi,et al.  An integrated Taguchi loss function–fuzzy cognitive map–MCGP with utility function approach for supplier selection problem , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[42]  H. Gupta,et al.  Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method , 2016 .

[43]  M. Ghazizadeh,et al.  Eco-efficiency considering the issue of heterogeneity among power plants , 2016 .

[44]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..