Establishing global and local correspondence between successive stimuli: the holistic nature of backward alignment.

Reflection decisions on alphanumeric characters display systemic effects of disorientation, suggesting that subjects mentally rotate the stimulus to the upright (the uprighting process). However, response time also increases with increasing angular disparity between the current and preceding orientations. This occurs only when the current stimulus is brought into congruence with the preceding one (the backward alignment process). In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that the transformation that occurs in backward alignment in holistic even in tasks in which the uprighting process is likely to be piecemeal. Evidence supporting this hypothesis is presented on the basis of tasks requiring either classification of numbers (Experiments 1 and 3) and words (Experiment 2), or mirror image discrimination on letter pairs (Experiment 4). The results indicated that backward alignment establishes global correspondence between successive stimuli and is indifferent to local correspondence at the level of the constituent elements. The establishment of this global correspondence decreases with the number of elements in the stimulus (Experiment 5), but its effects are still observed for four-letter strings (Experiment 6).

[1]  R. Luce,et al.  Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  A Koriat,et al.  What is rotated in mental rotation? , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M A Just,et al.  Normalization of irrelevant dimensions in stimulus comparisons. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  M. Corballis,et al.  Is mental rotation controlled or automatic? , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Howard S. Hock,et al.  The effects of stimulus structure and familiarity on same-different comparison , 1973 .

[7]  F Simion,et al.  Transformation processes upon the visual code , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  J. Norman,et al.  Reading rotated words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  A. Healy,et al.  Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[12]  C. E. Bethell-Fox,et al.  Mental rotation: effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity , 1988 .

[13]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  What the Mind’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Brain: A Critique of Mental Imagery , 1973 .

[14]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[15]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[16]  D. Bamber Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimull , 1969 .

[17]  A Koriat,et al.  Frames and images: sequential effects in mental rotation. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  S. Palmer,et al.  Holistic processes in the perception and transformation of disoriented figures. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  L. Cooper,et al.  Visual comparison processes: Identity and similarity decisions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[21]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[22]  J. Norman,et al.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Orientation in cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  L. Cooper Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  L. Cooper,et al.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  M. Corballis,et al.  Latency to categorize disoriented alphanumeric characters as letters or digits. , 1978 .

[28]  L C Robertson,et al.  Reference frames in mental rotation. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  The rate of “mental rotation” of images: A test of a holistic analogue hypothesis , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[30]  J. Hochberg,et al.  The effect of landmark features on mental rotation times , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[31]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[32]  Clark C. Presson Strategies in Spatial Reasoning. , 1982 .