Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of the quality and speech presentation rate (SPR) of synthetic speech and textual characteristics (length, complexity, genre) on a listener's ability to summarize paragraph-length texts. Forty able-bodied students and staff members were individually tested over a 3-day period, listening to eight texts produced by one of two synthesizers (DECtalk, Echo+) at a normal SPR or with 10-second intervals of silence interspersed between individual words. Using a discourse summarization taxonomy developed for this study, subjects listening to DECtalk speech produced more accurate summaries than did ECHO speech listeners, and synthetic speech presented at a slow rate was summarized more accurately than synthetic speech presented at a normal SPR. Additionally, a significant three-way interaction effect was noted for voice × SPR × text complexity. Echo listeners performed more poorly at normal versus slow SPRs regardless of text complexity level. However, ...

[1]  James E. Weaver,et al.  Language tests at school , 1979 .

[2]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L D Shriberg,et al.  A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  James J. Jenkins,et al.  Recall of passages of synthetic speech , 1982 .

[5]  Bambi B. Schieffelin,et al.  Topic as a discourse notion: a study of topics in the conversations of children and adults , 2016 .

[6]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups , 1990 .

[7]  Parimala Raghavendra,et al.  Comprehension of synthetic speech with three text-to-speech systems using a sentence verification paradigm , 1993 .

[8]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups , 1987 .

[9]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Comprehension of Synthetic Speech Produced by Rule: Word Monitoring and Sentence-by-Sentence Listening Times , 1991, Human factors.

[10]  D. Jeffery Higginbotham,et al.  Analysis of Listeners' Summaries of Synthesized Speech Passages , 1995 .

[11]  John A. Waterworth,et al.  Speech and language-based interaction with machines: towards the conversational computer , 1988 .

[12]  T. Feustel,et al.  Capacity Demands in Short-Term Memory for Synthetic and .Natural Speech , 1983, Human factors.

[13]  Janice Light,et al.  Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication , 1991 .

[14]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility. , 1987, Computer speech & language.

[15]  H. S. Venkatagiri.  Effects of rate and pitch variations on the intelligibility of synthesized speech , 1991 .

[16]  Ronan G. Reilly.  Communication failure in dialogue and discourse: detection and repair processes , 1986 .

[17]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables , 1975 .

[18]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech , 1989 .

[20]  John Herbert,et al.  A Guide for Developers and Users of Observation Systems and Manuals , 1975 .