On Innovation Performance of Low-Carbon Technology Breakthrough Innovation Network in Manufacturing Industry Under the Global Value Chain: A Case Study Based on Chinese Manufacturing Industries

The strengthening scientific and reasonable quantitative evaluation of innovation performance of low-carbon technology breakthrough innovation network in manufacturing industry under the background of economic globalization is of important significance, which can enrich relevant theoretical system of low-carbon technology breakthrough and improve the core competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing industries. In this paper, the scientific and reasonable quantitative evaluation of the innovation performance of low-carbon technology breakthrough innovation network is firstly determined as a dynamic (time-varying) evaluation problem, which involves multi-source influencing factors. Note that many evaluation objects in the innovation performance of an innovation network are gray, ambiguous and dynamic variables, which are difficult to be quantified and the collected industrial data has certain discreteness and fluctuation. Hence, a fuzzy clustering analysis on influencing variables of innovation performance of low-carbon technology innovation network is carried out via the sampling data from 28 manufacturing industries during 2011–2016. Moreover, an innovation performance evaluation model for low-carbon technology innovation network is constructed through analytic hierarchy process (AHP), grey theory and fuzzy clustering analysis. Based on this model, the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of innovation performances of the innovation network before and after low-carbon technology breakthrough are realized. The results show that the low-carbon technology breakthrough innovation has a positive effect on improving the development level of manufacturing industry. In addition, the construction performance evaluation model not only decreases the influences of subjective factors by combining qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis, but also applies the grey theory innovatively to determine the membership matrix. It realizes accurate, systematic and scientific evaluation of the innovation performance of the low-carbon technology breakthrough innovation network in the manufacturing industries. Finally, the research conclusions provide the theoretical and practical references to the strategic arrangement of the low-carbon technology breakthrough innovation in Chinese manufacturing industries.

[1]  WU Jian-lon.  Research on radical technology innovation paths of strategic emerging industries: from the perspective of modularization , 2014 .

[2]  Liu Yi.  The influence of corporate social responsibility basing on technological innovation on financial performance: an empirical research , 2013 .

[3]  Xia Jin.  Research on the Constraints on Technology Innovation and Strategies within China's Development of Low-carbon Economy , 2012 .

[4]  Walter Aerts,et al.  Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective , 2008 .

[5]  Richard Germain,et al.  Antecedents to Customer Involvement in Product Development:: Comparing US and Chinese Firms , 2004 .

[6]  Chaoqun Dong,et al.  A low-carbon evaluation method for manufacturing products based on fuzzy mathematics , 2020 .

[7]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The Strategy Selection Problem on Artificial Intelligence With an Integrated VIKOR and AHP Method Under Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information , 2019, IEEE Access.

[8]  A. Morrison,et al.  Global Value Chains and Technological Capabilities: A Framework to Study Learning and Innovation in Developing Countries , 2008 .

[9]  Yanbin Du,et al.  Exploring a new low‐carbon development paradigm for China's future manufacturing sectors , 2011 .

[10]  Alka Agrawal,et al.  Measuring the Sustainable-Security of Web Applications Through a Fuzzy-Based Integrated Approach of AHP and TOPSIS , 2019, IEEE Access.

[11]  Chen Zhu-hua.  Environmental Regulation,FDI and Technological Innovation in Pollution Abatement in China:A Study Based on Inter-provincial Dynamic Panel Data , 2011 .

[12]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis , 1997 .

[13]  Rajeev Kumar,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Integrated System of Hesitant Fuzzy Set, AHP and TOPSIS for Evaluating Security-Durability of Web Applications , 2020, IEEE Access.

[14]  L. Sleuwaegen,et al.  Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd Out Domestic Entrepreneurship? , 2002 .

[15]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  User involvement competence for radical innovation , 2007 .

[16]  Martin Bell,et al.  Where Do Foreign Direct Investment-Related Technology Spillovers Come From in Emerging Economies? An Exploration in Argentina in the 1990s , 2004 .

[17]  Douglas W. LaBahn,et al.  Early Supplier Involvement In Customer New Product Development: A Contingency Model Of Component Supplier Intentions , 2000 .

[18]  Huang Dong.  Dynamics and Obstacles of Low Carbon Technology Innovation in China , 2011 .

[19]  Zhihui Wu,et al.  Optimal Control Approach to Advertising Strategies of a Supply Chain Under Consignment Contract , 2019, IEEE Access.

[20]  R. Elliott,et al.  In Search of Environmental Spillovers , 2009 .

[21]  Bi Ke-xi,et al.  Effect of Innovation Resources Input on Green Innovation Capability of Green Innovation System: Empirical Research from the Perspective of Manufacturing FDI Inflows , 2014 .

[22]  Bing Sun,et al.  Do External Technology Sourcing and Industrial Agglomeration Successfully Facilitate an Increase in the Innovation Performance of High-Tech Industries in China? , 2019, IEEE Access.