From cell to movement: to what answers does EMG really contribute?

This paper aims to address some of the possibilities and limitations of EMG technologies available to date. Considerable progress has been achieved in this field during the last 30 years and EMG signals can be easily obtained on different levels beginning at the cell membrane and ending with the global EMG associated with the movement itself. Different aspects from cell to movement have been considered in this paper. Highly selective needle EMG for the detection of the processes at the membrane is discussed as well as high spatial resolution EMG which gives non-invasive access to the acquisition of the single motor unit activity. On the highest level of muscles, an expert system is introduced as a novel approach to support the interpretation of muscular co-ordination as detected by conventional surface EMG. While there is a high potential in the newly developed EMG methodologies, it is a big challenge to utilize these methodologies in order to obtain detailed, repeatable, reliable--and meaningful--results. However, the risk of over- and misinterpretation has to be carefully considered. In this paper, this risk is exemplified in situations dealing with muscle fatigue, conduction velocity and cross-talk. Despite all the new possibilities available, the authors recommend that EMG with its inherent strengths and limitations should still be diligently, but carefully, used.

[1]  Dario Farina,et al.  Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface EMG signals – Part II: conduction velocity estimation , 2003 .

[2]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Motor unit control properties in constant-force isometric contractions. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Kadefors,et al.  An electromyographic index for localized muscle fatigue. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[4]  D. Farina,et al.  Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part 2: Conduction velocity estimation , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  P. Rosenfalck Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models. , 1969, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[6]  Steen Andreassen,et al.  Computer-Aided Electromyography and Expert Systems , 1989 .

[7]  G Sjøgaard,et al.  Muscle injury in repetitive motion disorders. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Spatial Filtering of Noninvasive Multielectrode EMG: Part II-Filter Performance in Theory and Modeling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  R H Westgaard,et al.  Motor unit substitution in long-duration contractions of the human trapezius muscle. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Kaplan Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .

[11]  B Katz,et al.  The statistical nature of the acetylcholine potential and its molecular components , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  H. S. Gasser,et al.  Electrical Signs of Nervous Activity , 1937 .

[13]  D. Stegeman,et al.  The motor unit potential distribution over the skin surface and its use in estimating the motor unit location. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[14]  Z C Lateva,et al.  Influence of the fiber length on the power spectra of single muscle fiber extracellular potentials. , 1991, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Non-invasive approach of motor unit recording during muscle contractions in humans , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[16]  Jiri Silny,et al.  Spatial Filtering of Noninvasive Multielectrode EMG: Part I-Introduction to Measuring Technique and Applications , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  C J De Luca,et al.  Technique for detecting MUAP propagation from high-threshold motor units. , 1991, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  A. Monster,et al.  Surface electromyogram potentials of motor units; Relationship between potential size and unit location in a large human skeletal muscle , 1980, Experimental Neurology.

[19]  G Rau,et al.  Non-invasive detection of the single motor unit action potential by averaging the spatial potential distribution triggered on a spatially filtered motor unit action potential. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  T. Masuda,et al.  A surface electrode array for detecting action potential trains of single motor units. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  T. W. Van Weerden,et al.  Relationship between average muscle fibre conduction velocity and EMG power spectra during isometric contraction, recovery and applied ischemia , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[22]  G Rau,et al.  Estimation of the muscle fibre semi-length under varying joint positions on the basis of non-invasively extracted motor unit action potentials. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[23]  B Jonsson,et al.  Displacement, deformation and fracture of wire electrodes for electromyography. , 1968, Electromyography.

[24]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  G Rau,et al.  Noninvasive approach to motor unit characterization: muscle structure, membrane dynamics and neuronal control. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Knaflitz,et al.  Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  Dario Farina,et al.  Surface EMG crosstalk between knee extensor muscles: Experimental and model results , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[29]  D Farina,et al.  Compensation of the effect of sub-cutaneous tissue layers on surface EMG: a simulation study. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  O. A. Nikitin,et al.  Neither high-pass filtering nor mathematical differentiation of the EMG signals can considerably reduce cross-talk. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[31]  R Kadefors,et al.  Recruitment of low threshold motor-units in the trapezius muscle in different static arm positions. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[32]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[33]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Surface myoelectric signal cross-talk among muscles of the leg. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  High-Resolution Alignment of Sampled Waveforms , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  B. Hille,et al.  Ionic channels in nerve membranes. , 1970, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[37]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[38]  G. Hagg,et al.  Static work loads and occupational myalgia a new explanation model , 1991 .

[39]  P V Komi,et al.  Reproducibility of electromyographic measurements with inserted wire electrodes and surface electrodes. , 1970, Electromyography.

[40]  D. Farina,et al.  Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part I: Spatial selectivity , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[41]  C. J. Luca Control properties of motor units , 1985 .

[42]  R. Person,et al.  Rhythmic activity of a group of human motoneurones during voluntary contraction of a muscle. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  R Merletti,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of motor unit properties with linear electrode arrays. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[44]  G. Somjen,et al.  Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres , 1976, Nature.

[46]  P. L. Parmeggiani,et al.  Quantitative analysis of short term deprivation and recovery of desynchronized sleep in cats. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.