A modal approach for shape defect measurement based on global stereocorrelation

Abstract The metrology of mechanical parts using non-contact systems often requires complex post-processing operations to evaluate shape defects of the studied surface. For large parts, the geometric complexity combined with the amount of acquired data make such treatments long and tedious. To overcome this challenge, a shape defect measurement system based on global stereocorrelation is developed. This approach integrates a self-calibration step using the CAD model of the studied part that allows the measurement results to be directly expressed in the numerically defined frame of the part. The defects will be measured in a predefined modal basis, thereby introducing registrations with a limited number of degrees of freedom and allowing for easier analyses of the measured defects.

[1]  S. Roux,et al.  Spectral approach to displacement evaluation from image analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Li Yang,et al.  Tunnel contour detection during construction based on digital image correlation , 2020 .

[3]  François Hild,et al.  Mesh-Based Shape Measurements with Stereocorrelation , 2016 .

[4]  J. Passieux,et al.  Finite Element Stereo Digital Image Correlation: Framework and Mechanical Regularization , 2017 .

[5]  Clément Jailin.  Full field modal measurement with a single standard camera , 2018, Optics and Lasers in Engineering.

[6]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  Multiple-Camera Instrumentation of a Single Point Incremental Forming Process Pilot for Shape and 3D Displacement Measurements: Methodology and Results , 2011 .

[7]  Wenzhen Huang,et al.  Mode-based Decomposition of Part Form Error by Discrete-Cosine-Transform with Implementation to Assembly and Stamping System with Compliant Parts , 2002 .

[8]  Ernest L. Hall,et al.  Measuring Curved Surfaces for Robot Vision , 1982, Computer.

[9]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Optimization of a Cruciform Specimen Geometry for the Identification of Constitutive Parameters Based Upon Full‐Field Measurements , 2016 .

[10]  O. Faugeras.  Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint , 1993 .

[11]  Luigi Maria Galantucci,et al.  Measuring techniques suitable for verification and repairing of industrial components: A comparison among optical systems , 2019, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology.

[12]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Generalized fractal analysis and its applications to engineering surfaces , 1995 .

[13]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Digital Image Correlation , 2012 .

[14]  Liang Zhu,et al.  Efficient registration for precision inspection of free-form surfaces , 2007 .

[15]  Claire Lartigue,et al.  Evaluation of the shape deviation of non rigid parts from optical measurements , 2017 .

[16]  B. Beaubier,et al.  CAD-based calibration and shape measurement with stereoDIC , 2014 .

[17]  William T. Estler,et al.  Advances in Large-Scale Metrology – Review and future trends , 2016 .

[18]  Serge Samper,et al.  Form Defects Tolerancing by Natural Modes Analysis , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[19]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Simulation of variational compliant assemblies with shape errors based on morphing mesh approach , 2011 .

[20]  Claire Lartigue,et al.  Nonrigid Registration for Form Defect Identification of Thin Parts , 2018, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[21]  Xavier Armangué,et al.  A comparative review of camera calibrating methods with accuracy evaluation , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[23]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  Method for registration of 3-D shapes , 1992, Other Conferences.

[24]  Massimo Pacella,et al.  Point set augmentation through fitting for enhanced ICP registration of point clouds in multisensor coordinate metrology , 2013 .

[25]  Yong Su,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for DIC by consideration of both systematic errors and random errors , 2016 .

[26]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrology of freeform shaped parts , 2007 .

[27]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Guided 3D point cloud filtering , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[28]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Camera Calibration with Distortion Models and Accuracy Evaluation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[29]  F. Zernike.  Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects , 1942 .

[30]  S. Standard.  GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[31]  S. Roux,et al.  “Finite-Element” Displacement Fields Analysis from Digital Images: Application to Portevin–Le Châtelier Bands , 2006 .

[32]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  3D surface measurements with isogeometric stereocorrelation—Application to complex shapes , 2016 .

[33]  O. D. Faugeras,et al.  Camera Self-Calibration: Theory and Experiments , 1992, ECCV.

[34]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Shape, displacement and mechanical properties from isogeometric multiview stereocorrelation , 2015 .

[35]  Tilo Pfeifer,et al.  Optical Methods for Dimensional Metrology in Production Engineering , 2002 .

[36]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  Euclidean Reconstruction from Uncalibrated Views , 1993, Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision.

[37]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..