Feeder use predicts both acquisition and transmission of a contagious pathogen in a North American songbird

Individual heterogeneity can influence the dynamics of infectious diseases in wildlife and humans alike. Thus, recent work has sought to identify behavioural characteristics that contribute disproportionately to individual variation in pathogen acquisition (super-receiving) or transmission (super-spreading). However, it remains unknown whether the same behaviours enhance both acquisition and transmission, a scenario likely to result in explosive epidemics. Here, we examined this possibility in an ecologically relevant host–pathogen system: house finches and their bacterial pathogen, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, which causes severe conjunctivitis. We examined behaviours likely to influence disease acquisition (feeder use, aggression, social network affiliations) in an observational field study, finding that the time an individual spends on bird feeders best predicted the risk of conjunctivitis. To test whether this behaviour also influences the likelihood of transmitting M. gallisepticum, we experimentally inoculated individuals based on feeding behaviour and tracked epidemics within captive flocks. As predicted, transmission was fastest when birds that spent the most time on feeders initiated the epidemic. Our results suggest that the same behaviour underlies both pathogen acquisition and transmission in this system and potentially others. Identifying individuals that exhibit such behaviours is critical for disease management.

[1]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  The consequences of unidentifiable individuals for the analysis of an animal social network , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  William Hoppitt,et al.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Developmental stress predicts social network position , 2014, Biology Letters.

[5]  Pieter T. J. Johnson,et al.  Heterogeneous hosts: how variation in host size, behaviour and immunity affects parasite aggregation. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  Lauren Ancel Meyers,et al.  Network-based vaccination improves prospects for disease control in wild chimpanzees , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Measuring phenotypic assortment in animal social networks: weighted associations are more robust than binary edges , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Brenda McCowan,et al.  Linking social and pathogen transmission networks using microbial genetics in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe , 2013 .

[10]  A Cockburn,et al.  Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). , 2013, Ecology letters.

[11]  M. Dearing,et al.  The role of behavioural heterogeneity on infection patterns: implications for pathogen transmission , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  J. Adelman,et al.  Deposition of pathogenic Mycoplasma gallisepticum onto bird feeders: host pathology is more important than temperature-driven increases in food intake , 2013, Biology Letters.

[13]  W. Hochachka,et al.  Multiple host transfers, but only one successful lineage in a continent-spanning emergent pathogen , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  David N. Bonter,et al.  Daily foraging patterns in free-living birds: exploring the predation–starvation trade-off , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  T. Hahn,et al.  House finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) balance investment in behavioural and immunological defences against pathogens , 2013, Biology Letters.

[16]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Biting injuries and transmission of Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  Andrew J. J. MacIntosh,et al.  Monkeys in the Middle: Parasite Transmission through the Social Network of a Wild Primate , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Iead Rezek,et al.  Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  D. Farine,et al.  Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  S. Godfrey,et al.  Social networks and the spread of Salmonella in a sleepy lizard population , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[21]  Matthew E. Wolak,et al.  Guidelines for estimating repeatability , 2012 .

[22]  Richard James,et al.  Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  R. Etienne,et al.  Does animal behavior underlie covariation between hosts' exposure to infectious agents and susceptibility to infection? Implications for disease dynamics. , 2011, Integrative and comparative biology.

[24]  S. Godfrey,et al.  Using social networks to deduce whether residents or dispersers spread parasites in a lizard population. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  D. M. Hawley,et al.  Experimental infection of domestic canaries (Serinus canaria domestica) with Mycoplasma gallisepticum: a new model system for a wildlife disease , 2011, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[26]  David N. Bonter,et al.  A low‐cost radio frequency identification device for ornithological research , 2011 .

[27]  S. Altizer,et al.  Disease ecology meets ecological immunology: understanding the links between organismal immunity and infection dynamics in natural populations , 2011 .

[28]  K. Bouwman,et al.  Sickness behaviour acting as an evolutionary trap? Male house finches preferentially feed near diseased conspecifics , 2010, Biology Letters.

[29]  Robert P. Freckleton,et al.  Dealing with collinearity in behavioural and ecological data: model averaging and the problems of measurement error , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  J. Drewe,et al.  Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  P. Böelle,et al.  Peripatetic health-care workers as potential superspreaders , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Richard James,et al.  Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  D. Franks,et al.  Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Niels J. Dingemanse,et al.  Effect of PIT Tags on the Survival and Recruitment of Great Tits Parus major , 2008 .

[35]  L. Harrington,et al.  Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) affects mosquito blood feeding patterns. , 2007, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[36]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Experimental evidence for transmission of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in house finches by fomites , 2007, Avian pathology : journal of the W.V.P.A.

[37]  Elliott C. H. Swarthout,et al.  House Finch Carpodacus mexicanus roosting behaviour during the non-breeding season and possible effects of mycoplasmal conjunctivitis , 2006 .

[38]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Characterization of Experimental Mycoplasma gallisepticum Infection in Captive House Finch Flocks , 2006, Avian diseases.

[39]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[40]  V. Ezenwa Host social behavior and parasitic infection: a multifactorial approach , 2004 .

[41]  Wesley M. Hochachka,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in eastern North American house finches , 2004 .

[42]  R. Kristoffersen,et al.  AGGREGATION OF HELMINTHS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF FISH HOSTS , 2004, The Journal of parasitology.

[43]  A. Schuchat,et al.  Superspreading SARS Events, Beijing, 2003 , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[44]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[45]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[46]  W. Hochachka,et al.  Density-dependent decline of host abundance resulting from a new infectious disease. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  L. Bejder,et al.  A method for testing association patterns of social animals , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  A. Dhondt,et al.  RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH MYCOPLASMAL CONJUNCTIVITIS IN HOUSE FINCHES , 1998, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[49]  J. Klein,et al.  Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data , 1997 .

[50]  C. Dye,et al.  Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  D. Stallknecht,et al.  Mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in wild songbirds: the spread of a new contagious disease in a mobile host population. , 1997, Emerging infectious diseases.

[52]  M. Madigan,et al.  Brock Biology of Microorganisms , 1996 .

[53]  Roy M. Anderson,et al.  Transmission dynamics of HIV infection , 1987, Nature.

[54]  J. Edman,et al.  Malaria renders mice susceptible to mosquito feeding when gametocytes are most infective. , 1983, The Journal of parasitology.

[55]  J. Aldrich Rapid Evolution in the House Finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) , 1982 .

[56]  R. May,et al.  Population biology of infectious diseases: Part II , 1979, Nature.

[57]  R. May,et al.  Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I , 1979, Nature.

[58]  W. Thompson Agonistic Behavior in the House Finch. Part II: Factors in Aggressiveness and Sociality , 1960 .