Improved classification of conservation tillage adoption using high temporal and synthetic satellite imagery

Abstract Conservation tillage management has been advocated for carbon sequestration and soil quality preservation purposes. Past satellite image analyses have had difficulty in differentiating between no-till (NT) and minimal tillage (MT) conservation classes due to similarities in surface residues, and may have been restricted by the availability of cloud-free satellite imagery. This study hypothesized that the inclusion of high temporal data into the classification process would increase conservation tillage accuracy due to the added likelihood of capturing spectral changes in MT fields following a tillage disturbance. Classification accuracies were evaluated for Random Forest models based on 250-m and 500-m MODIS, 30-m Landsat, and 30-m synthetic reflectance values. Synthetic (30-m) data derived from the Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM) were evaluated because high frequency Landsat image sets are often unavailable within a cropping season due to cloud issues. Classification results from a five-date Landsat model were substantially better than those reported by previous classification tillage studies, with 94% total and ≥ 88% class producer's accuracies. Landsat-derived models based on individual image scenes (May through August) yielded poor MT classifications, but a monthly increase in accuracy illustrated the importance of temporal sampling for capturing regional tillage disturbance signatures. MODIS-based model accuracies (90% total; ≥ 82% class) were lower than in the five-date Landsat model, but were higher than previous image-based and survey-based tillage classification results. Almost all the STARFM prediction-based models had classification accuracies higher than, or comparable to, the MODIS-based results (> 90% total; ≥ 84% class) but the resulting model accuracies were dependent on the MODIS/Landsat base pairs used to generate the STARFM predictions. Also evident within the STARFM prediction-based models was the ability for high frequency data series to compensate for degraded synthetic spectral values when classifying field-based tillage. The decision to use MODIS or STARFM-based data within conservation tillage analysis is likely situation dependent. A MODIS-based approach requires little data processing and could be more efficient for large-area mapping; however a STARFM-based analysis might be more appropriate in mixed-pixel situations that could potentially compromise classification accuracy.

[1]  J. C. Price Comparing MODIS and ETM+ data for regional and global land classification , 2003 .

[2]  J. Wickham,et al.  Thematic accuracy of the NLCD 2001 land cover for the conterminous United States , 2010 .

[3]  Jiaguo Qi,et al.  Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices , 2004 .

[4]  Khaled El Emam,et al.  Benchmarking Kappa: Interrater Agreement in Software Process Assessments , 1999, Empirical Software Engineering.

[5]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman Cutler classifications (RandomForest) , 2006 .

[6]  W. Cohen,et al.  Landsat's Role in Ecological Applications of Remote Sensing , 2004 .

[7]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security , 2004, Science.

[8]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Documenting no-till and conventional till practices using Landsat ETM+ imagery and logistic regression , 2002 .

[9]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  MAPPING INVASIVES PLANTS USING HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY, CLASSIFICATION TREES, AND CLASSIFICATION THRESHOLDS , 2006 .

[10]  D. Lobell,et al.  Cropland distributions from temporal unmixing of MODIS data , 2004 .

[11]  Keith Paustian,et al.  Potential Soil C Sequestration on U.S. Agricultural Soils , 2003 .

[12]  B. Wardlow,et al.  A comparison of MODIS 250-m EVI and NDVI data for crop mapping: a case study for southwest Kansas , 2010 .

[13]  Sakae Shibusawa,et al.  Field-derived spectral characteristics to classify conventional and conservation agricultural practices , 2007 .

[14]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Generation of dense time series synthetic Landsat data through data blending with MODIS using a spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model. , 2009 .

[15]  J. Watts,et al.  An analysis of cropland carbon sequestration estimates for North Central Monana , 2011 .

[16]  Albert J. Peters,et al.  Use of Multispectral Ikonos Imagery for Discriminating between Conventional and Conservation Agricultural Tillage Practices , 2003 .

[17]  Timothy C. Strickland,et al.  Satellite mapping of conservation tillage adoption in the Little River experimental watershed, Georgia , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[18]  Yang Shao,et al.  Mapping Cropland and Major Crop Types across the Great Lakes Basin using MODIS-NDVI Data , 2010 .

[20]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Remote sensing of contrasting tillage practices in the Texas Panhandle , 2008 .

[21]  B. Wardlow,et al.  Large-area crop mapping using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI data: An assessment for the U.S. Central Great Plains , 2008 .

[22]  D. C. Reicosky,et al.  Conservation Agriculture: Global Environmental Benefits of Soil Carbon Management , 2003 .

[23]  T. Friedrich,et al.  Development and Current Status of No-till Adoption in the World Rolf , 2009 .

[24]  Rasmus Fensholt,et al.  Remote Sensing , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[25]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[26]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[27]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A new data fusion model for high spatial- and temporal-resolution mapping of forest disturbance based on Landsat and MODIS , 2009 .

[28]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Predicting tillage practices and agricultural soil disturbance in north central Montana with Landsat imagery , 2006 .

[29]  A. J. Stern,et al.  Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity , 2006 .

[30]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  An accuracy assessment framework for large‐area land cover classification products derived from medium‐resolution satellite data , 2006 .

[31]  D. Roy,et al.  The availability of cloud-free Landsat ETM+ data over the conterminous United States and globally , 2008 .

[32]  José Alexandre Melo Demattê,et al.  Visible–NIR reflectance: a new approach on soil evaluation , 2004 .

[33]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[34]  J. Watts,et al.  Monitoring of cropland practices for carbon sequestration purposes in north central Montana by Landsat remote sensing , 2009 .

[35]  Gyanesh Chander,et al.  Revised Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper Radiometric Calibration , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[36]  P. Chavez Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .

[37]  David P. Roy,et al.  The Availability of Cloud-free Landsat ETM+ Data Over the Conterminous U.S. and Globally , 2007 .

[38]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Residue management, conservation tillage and soil restoration for mitigating greenhouse effect by CO2-enrichment , 1997 .

[39]  M. Pal,et al.  Random forests for land cover classification , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[40]  Mathew R. Schwaller,et al.  On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[41]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of optical remote sensing models for crop residue cover assessment , 2004 .

[42]  Bojan Cukic,et al.  Robust prediction of fault-proneness by random forests , 2004, 15th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.

[43]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[44]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data—Principles and Practices, Second edition, Russell G. Congalton, Kass Green. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL (2009), 183 pp., Price: $99.95, ISBN: 978-1-4200-5512-2 , 2009 .

[45]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[46]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Carbon sequestration in soils , 1999 .