This paper presents an approach for the integrated consideration of both technical and valuation uncertainties during decision making supported by LCA-type environmental performance information. Key elements of this approach include "distinguishability analysis" to determine whether the uncertainty in the performance information is likely to make it impossible to distinguish between the activities under consideration, and the use of a multivariate statistical analysis approach, called principal components analysis (PCA), which facilitates the rapid analysis of large numbers of parallel sets of results, and enables the identification of choices that lead to similar and/or opposite evaluations of activities. The integrated approach for the management of uncertainty is demonstrated for a technology selection decision for the recommissioning of a coal-based power station. Distinguishability analysis showed that it was not possible to obtain a conclusive answer with regard to the preferred technology due to the extensive uncertainty in the LCA-based environmental performance information. PCA of the ranking of the design scenarios demonstrated that valuation uncertainties associated with choices made during intra- and inter-criterion preference modelling had a more significant effect on the ranking of the design scenarios than the inclusion/exclusion of environmental indicators reflecting local concerns or the choice of the position of the LCIA impact indicators in the cause-effect network. The results suggest that stakeholder involvement in intra- and inter-criterion preference modelling is important, and that the "encoding" of value judgements and preferences into LCA environmental performance information is to be avoided. As a whole, the paper supports a call for diversity in LCA methodology rather than one for greater standardisation, and provides a foundation for the consideration of the implications of such methodological diversity as part of an overall approach to promote effective decision making based on LCA environmental performance information.
[1]
M. Meier.
Eco-efficiency evaluation of waste gas purification systems in the chemical industry
,
1997
.
[2]
Jyri Seppälä,et al.
Decision analysis as a tool for life cycle impact assessment
,
1999
.
[3]
Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.
A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment
,
2001
.
[4]
Theodor J. Stewart,et al.
Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach
,
2001
.
[5]
Adisa Azapagic,et al.
Environmental System Analysis: The Application of Linear Programming to Life Cycle Assessment Volume 1
,
1996
.
[6]
Max Henrion,et al.
Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis
,
1990
.
[7]
Pauli Miettinen,et al.
How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA)
,
1997
.
[8]
Jyri Seppälä,et al.
Decision Analysis Frameworks for Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment
,
2001
.
[9]
E. Hertwich,et al.
A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis
,
2001
.
[10]
J. Edward Jackson,et al.
A User's Guide to Principal Components.
,
1991
.
[11]
Lauren Basson.
Context compensation and uncertainty in environmental decision making
,
2004
.
[12]
Jim Petrie,et al.
Process synthesis and optimisation tools for environmental design: methodology and structure
,
2000
.