Inclusive Planning Process for Citywide Bus Network Restructuring: Experience and Impacts

Despite an overwhelming case for the redevelopment of historically based bus networks, reviews are difficult to implement because of limited funding, equity concerns, complex technical challenges, difficulty in communicating technical issues to stakeholders, and potential displacement of existing users. This paper describes a bus network review process designed in Melbourne, Australia, to address these issues. The process adopts evidence-based planning and achieves a consensus of outcomes by using an inclusive design process with advanced analysis tools to communicate technical issues effectively to a nontechnical audience. Previous research does not directly address the practical implementation of bus review processes and tends either to focus on short-term bus planning approaches or to consider theoretical applications with limited practical value. The bus network review process developed is based on strategic studies aimed at opportunities to grow bus markets. The process is highly consultative to build stakeholder buy-in and adopts a two-stage program of (a) problem identification inputs and (b) draft network review inputs using nominal group techniques to ensure inclusive participation and quantification of outputs. The review process uses a simple-to-understand hierarchy approach to review services including assessment of access, time factors, ease of use, safety, and awareness. Graphical techniques including geographic information systems are adopted for clear and simple presentation of technical outputs. The process has been powerful in building buy-in and has resulted in A$1.4 billion (US$1.3 billion) of investment in improved services with high ridership growth outcomes. Experience and effects, including areas for future research, are outlined.

[1]  Jay A Goodwill,et al.  Best Practices in Transit Service Planning , 2009 .

[2]  J. Preston,et al.  The demand for public transport: a practical guide , 2004 .

[3]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: Urban Transit: Systems and Technology by Vukan R. Vuchic. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2007 , 2007 .

[4]  P. Haas,et al.  Understanding Transit Ridership Growth: Case Studies of Successful Transit Systems in the 1990s , 2003 .

[5]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[6]  Peter G Furth,et al.  SETTING FREQUENCIES ON BUS ROUTES: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1981 .

[7]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modeling and Practice , 2007 .

[8]  R. van Nes,et al.  Importance of Objectives in Urban Transit-Network Design , 2000 .

[9]  Graham Currie,et al.  SETTING PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICE STANDARDS: AN ECONOMIC APPROACH , 2003 .

[10]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING: CURRENT PRACTICE AND A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK , 1984 .

[11]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Urban transit systems and technology , 2007 .

[12]  Graham Currie,et al.  Effective ways to grow urban bus markets: a synthesis of evidence , 2007 .

[13]  Evans.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 9 - TRANSIT SCHEDULING AND FREQUENCY , 2004 .

[14]  Kittelson,et al.  A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance-Measurement System , 2003 .

[15]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  User and Operator Perspectives in Transit Network Design , 1998 .

[16]  R H Pratt,et al.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 12 - TRANSIT PRICING AND FARES , 2004 .

[17]  S. C. Wirasinghe,et al.  Nearly optimal parameters for a rail/feeder-bus system on a rectangular grid , 1980 .

[18]  Tiong An Chua,et al.  The planning of urban bus routes and frequencies: A survey , 1984 .

[19]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation , 2007 .

[20]  Graham Currie,et al.  Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs , 2010 .

[21]  R H Pratt,et al.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 10 - BUS ROUTING AND COVERAGE , 2004 .

[22]  Graham Currie,et al.  High Ridership Growth from Extended Transit Service Hours , 2009 .