Energy, emissions and environmental impact analysis of wind turbine using life cycle assessment technique

Wind turbine used for electricity generation is known as clean and renewable energy technology. The worldwide increasing trend of wind turbine installation present and future projection addressing the issue of energy required for manufacture and environmental impact due to energy consumption. The life cycle energy and environmental impact of wind turbine has been studied in many literature, but some studies are based on average data, the life cycle stages are incomplete of some study, most of the literature are horizontal axis type and the literature for Asian developing countries are rare. In addition, the life cycle study of vertical axis wind turbine is unusual. Since, the life cycle assessment (LCA) study varied from location to location due to industrial performance, countries energy mix and related issues, a life cycle embodied energy, emissions and environmental impacts analysis were undertaken for two grid connected rooftop wind turbines (vertical axis and horizontal axis) considering the industrial performance, applications and related issues in Thailand. The life cycle assessment was done using SimaPro 7.3.3 software from cradle to grave for base case and for alternative cases. The result showed that, wind turbine installation in Thailand at Chiangmai is reliable to deliver wind energy over the year compared to Phuket and Surat Thani Island. The vertical axis wind turbine is energy and emission intensive per kWh/year energy delivered compared to horizontal axis wind turbine for base case system. The embodied energy and environmental impact could be possible to reduce by more than 60% and 50% respectively using reuse of materials strategy. The embodied energy of vertical axis wind turbine could be possible to reduce by 36% with thermoplastic and 40% with fiberglass plastic turbine instead of aluminum turbine, while the environmental impact reduction more than 15% has been observed. The energy intensity, CO2 emission intensity and energy payback time found to be lower when compared with literature.

[1]  John Rankin,et al.  Energy use in metal production , 2012 .

[2]  P. Musgrove.  Wind Power , 2010 .

[3]  S. Chaitep,et al.  Wind power potential and characteristic analysis of Chiang Mai, Thailand , 2010 .

[4]  Julia C. Chatterton,et al.  Carbon Brainprint Case Study: novel offshore vertical axis wind turbines , 2011 .

[5]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield , 2009 .

[6]  Jim McVeigh,et al.  Wind Turbine - Materials and Manufacturing Fact Sheet , 2001 .

[7]  S. Pellegrini,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine , 2009 .

[8]  Hadeed Ahmed Sher,et al.  Micro-inverters — Promising solutions in solar photovoltaics , 2012 .

[9]  Toshihiko Masui,et al.  GHG emission scenarios in Asia and the world: The key technologies for significant reduction , 2012 .

[10]  Nalanie Mithraratne,et al.  Roof-top wind turbines for microgeneration in urban houses in New Zealand , 2009 .

[11]  Supakorn Saengsrithorn,et al.  The first medium wind/diesel pilot project in Thailand , 2010, Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy and Sustainable Development: Issues and Strategies (ESD 2010).

[12]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[13]  Sergio Pacca,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an onshore wind farm located at the northeastern coast of Brazil , 2013 .

[14]  Begoña Guezuraga,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines , 2012 .

[15]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines , 2009 .

[16]  Valerio Lo Brano,et al.  Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm , 2008 .

[17]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .