Automated optic nerve analysis for diagnostic support in glaucoma

The availability of modern imaging techniques such as confocal scanning laser tomography (CSLT) for capturing high-quality optic nerve images offer the potential for developing automatic and objective methods for supporting clinical decision-making in glaucoma. We present a hybrid approach that features the analysis of CSLT images using moment methods to derive abstract image defining features, and the use of these features to train classifiers for automatically distinguishing CSLT images of healthy and diseased optic nerves. As a first step, in this paper, we present investigations in feature subset selection methods for reducing the relatively large input space produced by the moment methods. Our results demonstrate that our methods discriminate between healthy and glaucomatous optic nerves based on shape information automatically derived from CSLT tomography images.

[1]  N. Swindale,et al.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Toward Optimal Feature Selection , 1996, ICML.

[3]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Glaucoma Diagnosis by Indirect Classifiers , 2002 .

[4]  Pat Langley,et al.  Selection of Relevant Features and Examples in Machine Learning , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[5]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  A novel approach to diagnose diabetes based on the fractal characteristics of retinal images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[7]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Estevam R. Hruschka,et al.  Feature Selection by Bayesian Networks , 2004, Canadian Conference on AI.

[10]  Andrew R. McIntyre,et al.  Toward glaucoma classification with moment methods , 2004, First Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, 2004. Proceedings..

[11]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Alireza Khotanzad,et al.  Classification of invariant image representations using a neural network , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[13]  B Lausen,et al.  Diagnosis of glaucoma by indirect classifiers. , 2003, Methods of information in medicine.

[14]  Jong-Min Park,et al.  Active feature selection in optic nerve data using support vector machine , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN'02 (Cat. No.02CH37290).

[15]  H. Schroder,et al.  Confocal Laser Tomographic Scanning Of The Eye , 1989, Optics & Photonics.

[16]  Roland T. Chin,et al.  On Image Analysis by the Methods of Moments , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  I︠u︡. V. Vorobʹev Method of moments in applied mathematics , 1965 .