‘We were expected to be equal’: teachers and academics sharing professional learning through practitioner inquiry

This paper describes a process in which early childhood professionals, who were novice researchers, engaged in their own research projects in collaboration with academics through a practitioner inquiry group. The aim of the project was to introduce the concepts and practices of practitioner enquiry, and learn about, plan and implement a self-initiated change project in consultation with academics. The paper details how a group of teachers succeeded in sustaining a community of practice that promoted teacher professionalism and change. Research has previously called for a shift in professional habitus and raised concerns about the value of teacher learning groups, the dispositions of teachers to call on academic research, and by implication, the desire to work actively with academics. Here we draw upon empirical data to raise the hope that the enablement and dissemination of collaborative change-focused research projects, while challenging, may provide viable avenues for successful teacher change.

[1]  G. L. Collected Papers , 1912, Nature.

[2]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[3]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[4]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[5]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[6]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. , 2001 .

[7]  Y. Benschop,et al.  Reflexive Methodology, New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[8]  J. Sachs The Activist Teaching Profession , 2003 .

[9]  A. Gitlin,et al.  [RE]Visioning the academic–teacher divide: power and knowledge in the educational community , 2004 .

[10]  H. Borko Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[11]  S. Groundwater‐Smith,et al.  Ethics in practitioner research: an issue of quality , 2007 .

[12]  K. Stacey,et al.  Top of the class report on the inquiry into teacher education, University of Melbourne Faculty of Education submission. , 2007 .

[13]  T. Downes,et al.  Robust Hope and Teacher Education Policy , 2007 .

[14]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith and Susan L. Lytle Everything’s ethics: Practitioner inquiry and university culture , 2007 .

[15]  Christine Woodrow,et al.  W(H)Ither the Early Childhood Teacher: Tensions for Early Childhood Professional Identity between the Policy Landscape and the Politics of Teacher Regulation , 2007 .

[16]  J. Elliott Assessing the quality of action research , 2007 .

[17]  P. Hughes Doing Action Research in Early Childhood Studies: a step by step guide , 2009 .

[18]  J. Gore,et al.  Rounding out professional development: professional learning community, instructional rounds and quality teaching , 2010 .

[19]  Marianne Fenech,et al.  Promoting Early Childhood Teacher Professionalism in the Australian Context: The Place of Resistance , 2010 .

[20]  J. Gore,et al.  Examining the impact of Quality Teaching Rounds on teacher professional learning , 2010 .

[21]  J. Ladwig Curriculum and Teacher Change , 2010 .

[22]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[23]  Tanya Serry,et al.  Making sense of qualitative data , 2013 .