Dedicated breast computed tomography: the optimal cross-sectional imaging solution?

[1]  John M Boone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  P. Dawson.  Functional imaging in CT. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional? , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Analysis of a novel offset cone-beam computed mammotomography system geometry for accomodating various breast sizes. , 2006, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[5]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  Stephen J Glick,et al.  Breast CT. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[7]  Andrew P. Smith,et al.  Clinical Performance of Breast Tomosynthesis as a Function of Radiologist Experience Level , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[8]  Carl J. D'Orsi,et al.  Stereoscopic Digital Mammography: Improved Accuracy of Lesion Detection in Breast Cancer Screening , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. , 2008, Radiology.

[10]  J. Hilden,et al.  Performance of clinical mammography: A nationwide study from Denmark , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[11]  Rhian Gabe,et al.  The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? , 2004, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[12]  M. Yaffe.  Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience: Prionas ND, Lindfors KK, Ray S, et al (Univ of California Davis Med Ctr, Sacramento; et al) Radiology 256:714-723, 2010 § , 2011 .

[13]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  C. Kuhl.  Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images? , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour angiogenesis and its relation to contrast enhancement on computed tomography: a review. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[17]  M J Schell,et al.  Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Spencer L Bowen,et al.  PET characteristics of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner prototype , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[20]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Evaluation of a prospective scoring system designed for a multicenter breast MR imaging screening study. , 2006, Radiology.

[21]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Initial Characterization of a Dedicated Breast PET/CT Scanner During Human Imaging , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  D. Balvay,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: pathophysiology and implications for contrast-enhanced MRI and CT assessment , 2006, Abdominal Imaging.

[23]  C. Merritt.  Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[24]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[25]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[26]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.