Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Pattern recognition, learning and the base of individual psychology

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze how pattern recognition can contribute to the behavioral options of a goal‐oriented system. Design/methodology/approach – A functional approach is used to develop the necessary cybernetic structures of a pattern recognition unit that can store observations as new standards for pattern matching by itself and can later apply them to recognize patterns in incoming sensor data. Findings – Combining such a structure for pattern recognition with a feedback system shows that the resulting system can only deal with known patterns. To deal with novel patterns this structure has to be added to an adaptive system that can develop system‐specific behavior. Such a system has to able to initiate a trial and error process to test new behavior towards new patterns and to evaluate its effect on the highest, existential goal‐values of the system. Practical implications – A system with a pattern recognition unit that can set new standards for pattern matching by itself is identified as the point of departure where not‐programmable and unpredictable individual behavior starts. Dealing with newly‐recognized pattern requires individual behavioral solutions and a system‐specific evaluation of the achieved results in relation to the highest goal‐values of the system. Here internal “emotional” criteria to select behavior emerge as a cybernetic necessity. Originality/value – The paper is the third in a series of three on a cybernetic theory distinguishing system capable of pre‐programmed adaptation, system‐specific adaptation and learning. It determines the cybernetic starting point of individual psychology.

[1]  W. Bion,et al.  Experiences in groups. , 1961, Human relations; studies towards the integration of the social sciences.

[2]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  The cybernetics of viability: an overview , 2011, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[3]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Issues of organizational cybernetics and viability beyond Beer’s viable systems model , 2013, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[4]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: preprogrammed adaptive systems , 2010, Kybernetes.

[5]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[6]  Helmut Nechansky Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Design rules for complex goal-orientated systems , 2009 .

[7]  W. Ashby Design for a Brain , 1954 .

[8]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[9]  Raúl Rojas,et al.  Theorie der neuronalen Netze , 1993 .

[10]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[11]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  Elements of a cybernetic epistemology: Adaptive systems that can develop system-specific behavior , 2010, Kybernetes.

[12]  Helmut Nechansky,et al.  The cybernetics of social change - and history , 2008, Kybernetes.

[13]  Helmut Nechansky Cybernetics as the science of decision making , 2011, Kybernetes.

[14]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A Theory of Human Memory: Self-Organization and Performance of Sensory-Motor Codes, Maps, and Plans , 1982 .

[15]  Valentin F. Turchin,et al.  The phenomenon of science , 1977 .

[16]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Change. Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York (Norton) 1974. , 1974 .

[17]  D. Goleman Emotional Intelligence. New York (Bantam) 1995. , 1995 .

[18]  K. Lorenz Die Rückseite des Spiegels : Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens , 1973 .

[19]  K. Horney Neurosis And Human Growth , 1950 .

[20]  Eric Berne,et al.  What do you say after you say hello , 1972 .