Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to assess patients willingness to accept mortal risk in the drug treatment of chronic rheumatic disease. DESIGN--A non-random sample of consecutive patients were interviewed with a standardised survey instrument. SETTING--The study took place in the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK. PATIENTS--100 consecutive in- and out-patients aged 65 or less were interviewed, 50 with rheumatoid arthritis and 50 with ankylosing spondylitis. Mean age was 48 years with mean disease duration of 14 years. The rheumatoid arthritis group was mainly female (84%), v 26% in the ankylosing spondylitis group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Risk preferences were elicited using the method of standard gamble in the context of a hypothetical new drug. Patients indicated the maximum percentage probability of mortality they regarded as acceptable to achieve four different levels of benefit: total cure (20.7%), relief of pain (16.9%), relief of stiffness (13.1%), return to normal functioning (14.5%). Rheumatoid arthritis patients displayed a higher (p less than 0.05) willingness to accept risk than ankylosing spondylitis patients for all gambles except relief of stiffness. Analysis of variance indicated that willingness to accept risk decreases with the duration of disease and increases with reductions in self assessed health status. CONCLUSIONS--Evaluative methods such as standard gamble can elicit useful risk-benefit preference data from patients to assist those who manage clinical risks.

[1]  B. O'brien,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of heart transplant programmes: quality of life data and their relationship to survival analysis. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  I. Kushner Does aggressive therapy of rheumatoid arthritis affect outcome? , 1989, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  A. Calin,et al.  Ankylosing spondylitis--an analytical review of 1500 patients: the changing pattern of disease. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  B. McNeil,et al.  Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Mcewen,et al.  Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community. , 1984, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[7]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour , 1944 .

[8]  M. Sirken Error effects of survey questionnaires on the public's assessments of health risks. , 1986, American Journal of Public Health.

[9]  H. Ueshima,et al.  Declining trends in blood pressure level and the prevalence of hypertension, and changes in related factors in Japan, 1956-1980. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[10]  D. Mulcahy,et al.  Cardiac transplantation in severely ill patients requiring intensive support in hospital , 1988, British medical journal.

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  The Measurement of Patients' Values in Medicine , 1982, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  G. Torrance Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. , 1986, Journal of health economics.

[14]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  The notion of "acceptable risk": the role of utility in drug management. , 1987, Journal of Chronic Diseases.

[15]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[16]  M S Thompson,et al.  Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[17]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Preferences for Health Outcomes , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.