Survey of 3D digital heritage repositories and platforms

Despite the increasing number of three-dimensional (3D) model portals and online repositories catering for digital heritage scholars, students and interested members of the general public, there are very few recent academic publications that offer a critical analysis when reviewing the relative potential of these portals and online repositories. Solid reviews of the features and functions they offer are insufficient; there is also a lack of explanations as to how these assets and their related functionality can further the digital heritage (and virtual heritage) field, and help in the preservation, maintenance, and promotion of real-world 3D heritage sites and assets. What features do they offer? How could their feature list better cater for the needs of the GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives and museums) sector? This article’s priority is to examine the useful features of 8 institutional and 11 commercial repositories designed specifically to host 3D digital models. The available features of their associated 3D viewers, where applicable, are also analysed, connecting recommendations for future-proofing with the need to address current gaps and weaknesses in the scholarly field of 3D digital heritage. Many projects do not address the requirements stipulated by charters, such as access, reusability, and preservation. The lack of preservation strategies and examples highlights the oxymoronic nature of virtual heritage (oxymoronic in the sense that the virtual heritage projects themselves are seldom preserved). To study these concerns, six criteria for gauging the usefulness of the 3D repositories to host 3D digital models and related digital assets are suggested. The authors also provide 13 features that would be useful additions for their 3D viewers. Highlights: A survey of relevant features from eight institutional and eleven commercial online 3D repositories in the scholarly fieldof 3D digital heritage. Presents a critical review of their hosting services and 3D model viewer features. Proposes six features to enhance services of 3D repositories to support the GLAM sector, heritage scholars andheritage communities.

[1]  J. Vilà,et al.  Virtual archaeology: from archaeological excavation to the management and diffusion of heritage. Les Cases de la Catedral (Tortosa) and the protohistorical settlement of La Cella (Salou), Tarragona , 2018 .

[2]  Alonzo C. Addison,et al.  Emerging Trends in Virtual Heritage , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[3]  Valentina Bonora,et al.  HIGH-QUALITY 3D MODELS AND THEIR USEIN A CULTURAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION PROJECT , 2017 .

[4]  Piotr Kuroczynski.  Virtual Research Environment for digital 3D reconstructions – Standards, thresholds and prospects , 2017 .

[5]  Erik Champion.  Metamodeling : 3D-(re)designing Polhem’s Laboratorium mechanicumn , 2019 .

[6]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  Delivering and using 3D models on the web: are we ready? , 2017 .

[7]  Ralf Schneider,et al.  Authenticity through VR-Based documentation of cultural heritage : A theoretical approach based on conservation and documentation practices , 2017 .

[8]  Lorna M. Hughes,et al.  Cultural Heritage Infrastructures in Digital Humanities , 2018 .

[9]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  3DHOP: 3D Heritage Online Presenter , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[10]  Ferdinand Maiwald,et al.  A 4D information system for the exploration of multitemporal images and maps using photogrammetry, web technologies and VR/AR , 2019, Virtual Archaeology Review.

[11]  Despoina Tsiafaki,et al.  BENEFITS AND PROBLEMS THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF 3D TECHNOLOGIES IN ARCHAEOLOGY: RECORDING, VISUALISATION, REPRESENTATION AND RECONSTRUCTION , 2015 .

[12]  Charalabos Ioannidis,et al.  An Integrated Approach to 3D Web Visualization of Cultural Heritage Heterogeneous Datasets , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Fabrizio Galeazzi,et al.  3-D Virtual Replicas and Simulations of the Past: “Real” or “Fake” Representations? , 2018, Current Anthropology.

[14]  Paola Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco,et al.  Authenticity and cultural heritage in the age of 3D digital reproductions , 2018 .

[15]  Herna L. Viktor,et al.  Long-term digital preservation: preserving authenticity and usability of 3-D data , 2009, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[16]  Stewart J. Spence.  Making the Model , 1906, The American journal of dental science.

[17]  Stella Markantonatou,et al.  THE ‘ SYNTHESIS ’ VIRTUAL MUSEUM , 2016 .

[18]  Paola Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco,et al.  Theorising 3D Visualisation Systems in Archaeology: Towards more effective design, evaluations and life cycles , 2017 .

[19]  Eugene Ch'ng,et al.  Visual Heritage in the Digital Age , 2016, Springer Series on Cultural Computing.

[20]  Pieter Pauwels,et al.  Architectural Information Modelling for Virtual Heritage Application , 2008, VSMM 2008.

[21]  E. Champion,et al.  3D Digital Heritage Models as Sustainable Scholarly Resources , 2019, Sustainability.

[22]  Harold Thwaites,et al.  Digital Heritage: What Happens When We Digitize Everything? , 2013, Visual Heritage in the Digital Age.

[23]  Lisa M. Snyder.  VSim: Scholarly Annotations in Real-Time 3D Environments , 2014, DH-CASE '14.

[24]  Tudor Salagean,et al.  3D Modeling for Digital Preservation of Romanian Heritage Monuments , 2015 .

[25]  Sander Münster,et al.  3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[26]  Jie Liu,et al.  U3D File Format Analyzing and 3DPDF Generating Method , 2017, IGTA.

[27]  Charles Marion,et al.  Bringing 3D visualization into the online research article , 2014, Inf. Serv. Use.

[28]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[29]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[30]  James Lloyd,et al.  Contextualizing 3D Cultural Heritage , 2016, EuroMed.

[31]  Elaine A. Sullivan.  POTENTIAL PASTS: TAKING A HUMANISTIC APPROACH TO COMPUTER VISUALIZATION OF ANCIENT LANDSCAPES , 2016 .

[32]  M. Clarke.  The Digital Dilemma , 2015, Advances in Archaeological Practice.

[33]  Lisa M. Snyder,et al.  Digital Karnak: , 2017 .

[34]  Kieron Niven,et al.  The Storage and Long-Term Preservation of 3D Data , 2017 .

[35]  Sander Münster,et al.  Digital 3D modelling in the humanities , 2018, DH.

[36]  Panayiotis Koutsabasis,et al.  Empirical Evaluations of Interactive Systems in Cultural Heritage: A Review , 2017 .

[37]  Greg Humphreys,et al.  Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models , 2009, JOCCH.

[38]  Y. Bernard,et al.  3D model as a dynamic compilation of knowledge: interim results on the city of Alet , 2017 .

[39]  Nataska Statham.  Scientific rigour of online platforms for 3D visualization of heritage , 2019, Virtual Archaeology Review.

[40]  Axel Newe,et al.  An Open Source Tool for Creating Model Files for Virtual Volume Rendering in PDF Documents , 2018, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[41]  Antonella Guidazzoli,et al.  From 3D Web to VR historical scenarios: A cross-media digital heritage application for audience development , 2017, 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM).

[42]  George Pavlidis,et al.  Methods for 3D digitization of Cultural Heritage , 2007 .