Sustaining scientific infrastructures: transitioning from grants to peer production (work-in-progress)

Science now relies on mid-level infrastructure, including shared instruments, cell lines, supercomputing resources, data sets, and software components. These are beyond the facilities and services traditionally provided by individual universities; funding agencies such as the NSF often support their initial creation but their long-term sustainability is a challenge and commercialization is only rarely an option. A promising model, though, is broad-based community support through peer production, often inspired by the organization of open source software projects. Such transitions, though, are not automatic or easy, just as commercialization is not. In this research I am studying successful and unsuccessful attempts to transition, building theory and practical guidance for scientists and funding agencies. In this work-inprogress paper, I present the motivation and background for the study and provide motivation through preliminary description of my first case study.

[1]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[2]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Shared leadership in the Apache project , 1999, CACM.

[3]  P. N. Edwards,et al.  Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges , 2013 .

[4]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  C OLLABORATION T HROUGH O PEN S UPERPOSITION : A T HEORY OF THE O PEN S OURCE W AY 1 , 2016 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[7]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[8]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[9]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions , 2016 .

[11]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Seeking the source: software source code as a social and technical artifact , 2005, GROUP.

[13]  B. Pentland Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[14]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know , 2012, CSUR.

[15]  Matthew Kay,et al.  Perceptions and practices of usability in the free/open source software (FoSS) community , 2010, CHI.

[16]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Incentives and integration in scientific software production , 2013, CSCW.

[17]  K. Weick The Generative Properties Of Richness , 2007 .

[18]  G. Bryan,et al.  Introducing Enzo, an AMR Cosmology Application , 2004, astro-ph/0403044.

[19]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  Jeremy Birnholtz,et al.  When authorship isn't enough: Lessons from CERN on the implications of formal and informal credit attribution mechanisms in collaborative research , 2008 .

[21]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[22]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[24]  Devin W. Silvia,et al.  ENZO: AN ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT CODE FOR ASTROPHYSICS , 2013, J. Open Source Softw..

[25]  Nicolas Ducheneaut,et al.  Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-Technical Analysis , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[26]  Scientific software production and collaboration , 2010 .

[27]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[28]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Jason E. Robbins Adopting OSS Methods by Adopting OSS Tools , 2002 .

[30]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Darrel C. Ince,et al.  The case for open computer programs , 2012, Nature.

[32]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Applying Organizational Routines in understanding organizational change , 2005 .

[33]  The Impact of Commercial Organizations on Volunteer , 2022 .

[34]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[35]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure , 2006, CSCW '06.

[36]  Weiling Ke,et al.  Extrinsic Motivations in Open Source Software Development Efforts and the Moderating Effects of Satisfaction of Needs , 2010 .

[37]  Teresa D. Harrison,et al.  Lessons from the JMCB Archive , 2006 .

[38]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Synergizing in Cyberinfrastructure Development , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[39]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[40]  J.-M. Dalle Toward collaborative open-source technology transfer , 2004, ICSE 2004.

[41]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Version management tools: CVS to BK in the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[42]  A. Bedeian,et al.  Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s , 1999 .

[43]  Martin Michlmayr Quality and the Reliance on Individuals in Free Software Projects , 2011 .

[44]  A. Greenhalgh Case Method Teaching as Science and Art , 2007 .

[45]  J. H. Davis,et al.  TOWARD A STEWARDSHIP THEORY OF MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[46]  Judith Segal Software Development Cultures and Cooperation Problems: A Field Study of the Early Stages of Development of Software for a Scientific Community , 2009, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[47]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The social structure of Open Source Software development teams , 2003 .

[48]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Why CSCW needs science policy (and vice versa) , 2013, CSCW.

[49]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences , 2001 .

[50]  S. Goldman,et al.  A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming , 2011 .

[51]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[52]  P. Resnick,et al.  Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design , 2012 .

[53]  Paula E. Stephan How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[54]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Sustaining the development of cyberinfrastructure: an organization adapting to change , 2012, CSCW.

[55]  K. Eisenhardt Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .