Comprehending anaphoric metaphors

In this study we investigate the comprehension of various kinds of anaphoric metaphors in context. We describe an experiment that manipulated the metaphoricity of simple noun + verb + ending sentences by using either a metaphoric noun or a metaphoric verb or both. Our results show that metaphoric nouns affect sentence comprehension to a greater extent than do metaphoric verbs. Thus, even though there were no sentence-reading time differences between metaphoric and literal targets, metaphoric nouns were read more slowly than were literal nouns, and they also affected the reading time of the following verb. Moreover, in trials involving metaphoric-noun targets, participants read the endings of the targets faster and made more mistakes in answering posttrial questions than they did in literal-noun trials. We argue that these results suggest a comprehension deficit for anaphoric noun metaphors even when they are preceded by a context.

[1]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  Interpreting Metaphors and Idioms: Some Effects of Context on Comprehension. Technical Report No. 93. , 1978 .

[2]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Metaphor and Thought , 1980 .

[3]  T. Brown Metaphor and Thought , 1981 .

[4]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Aptness in metaphor , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  P. Gildea,et al.  On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? , 1982 .

[6]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[7]  A. Healy,et al.  Dual processes in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. , 1983 .

[8]  A. Healy,et al.  Dual processes in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. , 1983 .

[9]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Richard J. Vondruska,et al.  Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity , 1985 .

[11]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[12]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Processing of metaphoric language: An investigation of the three-stage model of metaphor comprehension , 1985 .

[13]  J. L. Myers,et al.  The role of context in metaphor comprehension , 1987 .

[14]  B. Keysar On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. , 1989 .

[15]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Interpreting and evaluating metaphors , 1991 .

[17]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  G. Murphy,et al.  Metaphoric reference: When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[19]  B. Keysar Discourse context effects: Metaphorical and literal interpretations , 1994 .

[20]  R. Giora Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[21]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Conceptual Combinations: The Role of Similarity , 1998 .