Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory

Research on the emotional, cognitive, and social determinants of moral judgment has surged in recent years. The development of moral foundations theory (MFT) has played an important role, demonstrating the breadth of morality. Moral psychology has responded by investigating how different domains of moral judgment are shaped by a variety of psychological factors. Yet, the discipline lacks a validated set of moral violations that span the moral domain, creating a barrier to investigating influences on judgment and how their neural bases might vary across the moral domain. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by developing and validating a large set of moral foundations vignettes (MFVs). Each vignette depicts a behavior violating a particular moral foundation and not others. The vignettes are controlled on many dimensions including syntactic structure and complexity making them suitable for neuroimaging research. We demonstrate the validity of our vignettes by examining respondents’ classifications of moral violations, conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and demonstrating the correspondence between the extracted factors and existing measures of the moral foundations. We expect that the MFVs will be beneficial for a wide variety of behavioral and neuroimaging investigations of moral cognition.

[1]  J. Haidt,et al.  Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[4]  J. Haidt The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Frontopolar and anterior temporal cortex activation in a moral judgment task: preliminary functional MRI results in normal subjects. , 2001, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[6]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Functional Networks in Emotional Moral and Nonmoral Social Judgments , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Monica Baciu,et al.  Length effect during word and pseudo‐word reading. An event‐related fMRI study , 2002 .

[9]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[10]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Haidt,et al.  Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues , 2004, Daedalus.

[12]  T. Wheatley,et al.  Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe , 2005, Psychological science.

[13]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  Influence of bodily harm on neural correlates of semantic and moral decision-making , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The Moral Affiliations of Disgust: A Functional MRI Study , 2005, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[15]  D. Trafimow,et al.  An index of specific behaviors in the moral domain , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[16]  Carla L. Harenski,et al.  Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  Paul J Whalen,et al.  Prior experience as a stimulus category confound: an example using facial expressions of emotion. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[18]  Diana C. Robertson,et al.  The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Brad Olson,et al.  Family metaphors and moral intuitions: how conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Olga Antonenko,et al.  Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity. , 2008, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[21]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  Infection, Incest, and Iniquity: Investigating the Neural Correlates of Disgust and Morality , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  Is moral phenomenology unified? , 2008 .

[23]  G. Clore,et al.  Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment , 2008, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

[24]  G. Northoff,et al.  Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Keltner,et al.  Disgust and the moralization of purity. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[28]  Scott S. Wiltermuth,et al.  The Orthogonality of Praise and Condemnation in Moral Judgment , 2010 .

[29]  Jordan B Peterson,et al.  Compassionate Liberals and Polite Conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness With Political Ideology and Moral Values , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Vince D Calhoun,et al.  Neural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation , 2011, Social neuroscience.

[31]  Joshua D. Greene Emotion and Morality: A Tasting Menu , 2011 .

[32]  J. Prinz,et al.  A Bad Taste in the Mouth , 2011, Psychological science.

[33]  Yoel Inbar,et al.  On Disgust and Moral Judgment , 2011 .

[34]  Steven E. Petersen,et al.  Manipulation of Length and Lexicality Localizes the Functional Neuroanatomy of Phonological Processing in Adult Readers , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Carolyn Parkinson,et al.  Is Morality Unified? Evidence that Distinct Neural Systems Underlie Moral Judgments of Harm, Dishonesty, and Disgust , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  From left to right: how the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[37]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Mapping the moral domain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Dacher Keltner,et al.  Emotions as Moral Amplifiers: An Appraisal Tendency Approach to the Influences of Distinct Emotions upon Moral Judgment , 2011 .

[39]  J. Wright,et al.  The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart?☆ , 2011 .

[40]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Moral Values Are Associated with Individual Differences in Regional Brain Volume , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes , 2012 .

[42]  Jesse Graham,et al.  Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians , 2012, PloS one.

[43]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism , 2012 .

[44]  J. Haidt,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2014, Utilitas.

[45]  Christopher M. Federico,et al.  Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences , 2013 .

[46]  V. Ottati,et al.  The arousal model of moral condemnation , 2013 .

[47]  J. C. Biesanz,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  J. Fowler,et al.  Emotion Regulation as the Foundation of Political Attitudes: Does Reappraisal Decrease Support for Conservative Policies? , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  Christopher M. Federico,et al.  Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition , 2013 .

[50]  Scott Clifford,et al.  How Words Do the Work of Politics: Moral Foundations Theory and the Debate over Stem Cell Research , 2013, The Journal of Politics.

[51]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered Surveys , 2014 .

[52]  Eyal Sagi,et al.  Measuring Moral Rhetoric in Text , 2014 .

[53]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values , 2014 .

[54]  Scott Clifford Linking Issue Stances and Trait Inferences: A Theory of Moral Exemplification , 2014, The Journal of Politics.

[55]  The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion , 2015 .