This Isn’t CSI

The increasing application of forensic DNA analysis in the criminal justice system has led to considerable public debate. Such discussions typically center on either its use for identifying criminal offenders (and for exonerating those who have been wrongfully convicted) or legal questions concerning the proper scope of DNA evidence collection. Currently missing from these debates is an accurate estimate of the national backlog of cases that might benefit from the application of forensic DNA analysis. The authors estimate this backlog using data gathered from a nationally representative sample of local law enforcement agencies and from the total population of both state and local crime laboratories. The authors document the primary barriers identified by these agencies to the expanded use of forensic DNA analysis in the processing of criminal cases. The authors conclude with a discussion of the implications for the continued support of and increased access to forensic DNA testing by law enforcement agencies.

[1]  Graham Kalton,et al.  Introduction to Survey Sampling , 1983 .

[2]  Patricia Daniels Cornwell.  Portrait of a Killer: Jack the Ripper--Case Closed , 2002 .

[3]  R. Wenk.  Review of: Connors et al. “Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence after Trial” , 1997 .

[4]  D. Bayley.  Policing in America , 1998 .

[5]  Barry C. Scheck,et al.  Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right , 2000 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Friedman,et al.  Crime and Punishment in American History. , 1993 .

[7]  Bruce S. Weir,et al.  The Consequences of Defending DNA Statistics , 2000 .

[8]  Race to Incarcerate , 2001 .

[9]  S. Geisser.  Statistics, Litigation, and Conduct Unbecoming , 2000 .

[10]  Lillian Cohen,et al.  Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. , 1954 .

[11]  Alun Anderson,et al.  DNA fingerprinting on trial , 1989, Nature.

[12]  Sen. M.I.,et al.  Statistical Science in the Courtroom , 2001 .

[13]  J. Siegel,et al.  The Investigative Process , 2007 .

[14]  B S Weir.  The second National Research Council report on forensic DNA evidence. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[16]  George S. Duggar,et al.  Introduction: The Survey , 1965 .

[17]  David J. Balding,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Can Probability Theory Help? , 2000 .

[18]  D. Hartl,et al.  Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. , 1991, Science.

[19]  D. Baum.  Smoke and Mirrors: The War on Drugs and the Politics of Failure , 1996 .

[20]  B. S. Weir,et al.  A bibliography for the use of DNA in human identification , 1995 .

[21]  Travis C. Pratt,et al.  NATIONAL FORENSIC DNA STUDY REPORT , 2003 .

[22]  T. Gest.  Crime and Politics , 2001 .

[23]  D. Petrov,et al.  Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.