The Pharmacia story of entrepreneurship and as a creative technical university1 – an experiment in innovation, organizational break up and industrial renaissance

While innovative technology supply has been the focus of much neo-Schumpeterian modelling, few have addressed the critical and more resource-demanding commercializing of the same technologies. The result may have been a growth policy focused on the wrong problem. Using Competence Bloc Theory and a firm-based macro to macro approach we abandon the assumed linear relation between technology change and economic growth of such models, and demonstrate that lack of local commercialization competences is likely to block growth even though innovative technology supplies are abundant. The break up, reorganization and part withdrawal of Pharmacia from the local Uppsala (in Sweden) economy after a series of international mergers illustrate this. Pharmacia has ‘released’ a wealth of technologies in local markets. Local commercialization competence, notably industrially competent financing has, however, not been sufficient to fill in through indigenous entrepreneurship the vacuum left by Pharmacia. Only thanks to foreign investors, attracted by Pharmacia technologies that have opted to stay for the long term, the local Uppsala economy seems to be heading for a successful future. The Pharmacia case also demonstrates the role of advanced firms as ‘technical universities’ and the nature of an experimentally organized economy (EOE) in which business mistakes are a natural learning cost for economic development.

[1]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[2]  Erol Taymaz,et al.  The Knowledge Based Information Economy , 1990 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[4]  G. Eliasson,et al.  THE THEORY OF THE FIRM AND THE MARKETS FOR STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS , 2005 .

[5]  R. Day.  The Divergent Dynamics of Economic Growth: Studies in Adaptive Economizing, Technological Change, and Economic Development , 2003 .

[6]  G. Eliasson,et al.  The Human Factor in Economic and Technological Change. OECD Educational Monograph No. 3. , 1987 .

[7]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  On the macroeconomic effects of establishing tradability in weak property rights , 2003 .

[8]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Modeling the experimentally organized economy: Complex dynamics in an empirical micro-macro model of endogenous economic growth , 1991 .

[9]  G. Eliasson,et al.  The biotechnological competence bloc , 1996 .

[10]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  The Firm as a Competent Team , 1990 .

[11]  Sanford J. Grossman.  On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets , 1980 .

[12]  G. Eliasson,et al.  The knowledge base of an industrial economy , 1988 .

[13]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  The nature of economic change and management in a new knowledge based information economy , 2005, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[14]  Arnold Heertje,et al.  Grundbegriffe der Volkswirtschaftslehre , 1970 .

[15]  S. B. Linder,et al.  An essay on trade and transformation , 1964 .

[16]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Global Economic Intergration and Regional Attractors of Competence , 2003 .

[17]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Competition and Market Processes in a Simulation Model of the Swedish Economy , 1977 .

[18]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[19]  Richard H. Day.  The Divergent Dynamics of Economic Growth , 2003 .

[20]  Moses Abramovitz,et al.  Thinking about Growth , 1989 .

[21]  S. Klepper.  The Geography of Organizational Knowledge , 2005 .

[22]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[23]  K. Menger,et al.  Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre , 1924 .

[24]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[25]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Spillovers, integrated production and the theory of the firm , 1996 .

[26]  G. Eliasson.  Business Competence, Organizational Learning and Economic Growth: Establishing the Smith-Schumpeter-Wicksell (SSW) Connection , 1991 .

[27]  G. Eliasson.  Micro Heterogeneity of Firms and the Stability of Industrial Growth , 1984 .

[28]  G. Eliasson,et al.  Competence in Health Care - An Industrial Systems Analysis Using Competence Bloc Theory to Compare European and US Health Care , 2004 .

[29]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  General Purpose Technologies, Industrial Competence and Economic Growth , 1997 .

[30]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Technological systems and economic performance : the case of factory automation , 1995 .

[31]  W. E. G. Salter,et al.  Productivity and Technical Change. , 1961 .

[32]  B. Carlsson.  Technological Systems in the Bio Industries , 2002 .

[33]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Industrial policy, competence blocs and the role of science in economic development , 2000 .

[34]  U. Jakobsson,et al.  The Transformation of Ownership Policy and Structure in Sweden: Convergence towards the Anglo-Saxon Model? , 2003 .

[35]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[36]  Gunnar Eliasson.  The Firm and Financial Markets in the Swedish Micro-To-Macro Model: Theory, Model, and Verification , 1985 .

[37]  G. Eliasson,et al.  Technological competition and trade in the experimentally organized economy , 1987 .

[38]  A. Dixit.  Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  Information and Competitive Price Systems , 1976 .

[40]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Business economic planning: Theory, practice, and comparison , 1976 .

[41]  G. Eliasson.  The Role of Knowledge in Economic Growth , 2001 .

[42]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[43]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  The Pharmaceutical and Biotechnological Competence Bloc and the Development of Losec , 1997 .

[44]  A. Fridh.  DYNAMICS AND GROWTH: THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY , 2002 .

[45]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Firm Objectives, Controls and Organization: The Use of Information and the Transfer of Knowledge within the Firm , 1995 .

[46]  G. Eliasson.  The International Firm: A Vehicle for Overcoming Barriers to Trade and a Global Intelligence Organization Diffusing the Notion of a Nation , 1988 .