Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location.

The time course and spatial extent of movement-related suppression of the detection of weak electrical stimuli (intensity, 90% detected at rest) was determined in 118 experiments carried out in 47 human subjects. Subjects were trained to perform a rapid abduction of the right index finger (D2) in response to a visual cue. Stimulus timing was calculated relative to the onset of movement and the onset of electromyographic (EMG) activity. Electrical stimulation was delivered to 10 different sites on the body, including sites on the limb performing the movement (D2, D5, hand, forearm and arm) as well as several distant sites (contralateral arm, ipsilateral leg). Detection of stimuli applied to the moving digit diminished significantly and in a time-dependent manner, with the first significant decrease occurring 120 ms before movement onset and 70 ms before the onset of EMG activity. Movement-related and time-dependent effects were obtained at all stimulation sites on the homolateral arm as well as the adjacent trunk. A pronounced spatiotemporal gradient was observed: the magnitude of the movement-related decrease in detectability was greatest and earliest at sites closest to the moving finger and progressively weaker and later at more proximal sites. When stimuli were applied to the distant sites, only a small (approximately 10%), non-time-dependent decrease was observed during movement trials. A simple model of perceptual performance adequately described the results, providing insight into the distribution of movement-related inhibitory controls within the CNS.

[1]  E. Schmid,et al.  Temporal aspects of cutaneous interaction with two-point electrical stimulation. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  H L TEUBER,et al.  Effect of Knowledge of Site of Stimulation on the Threshold for Pressure Sensitivity , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  C. Sherrick,et al.  EFFECTS OF DOUBLE SIMULTANEOUS STIMULATION OF THE SKIN. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[5]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[6]  K. Abromeit Music Received , 2023, Notes.

[7]  R. Contini Body segment parameters. II. , 1972, Artificial limbs.

[8]  C. Ghez,et al.  Inhibition of afferent transmission in cuneate nucleus during voluntary movement in the cat. , 1972, Brain research.

[9]  J. D. Coulter,et al.  Sensory transmission through lemniscal pathway during voluntary movement in the cat. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  W. Spencer,et al.  Cutaneous masking. I. Psychophysical observations on interactions of multipoint stimuli in man. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  R. Malenka,et al.  Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  C. C. Boylls,et al.  Velocity-dependent suppression of somatosensory evoked potentials during movement. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  Activity of dentate neurons during arm movements triggered by visual, auditory, and somesthetic stimuli in the monkey. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  L. Cohen,et al.  Selectivity of attenuation (i.e., gating) of somatosensory potentials during voluntary movement in humans. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  L. Cohen,et al.  Localization, timing and specificity of gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement in man. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  H. Buchtel,et al.  Spatial attentional shifts: Further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  F Shawkat,et al.  Centrifugal and centripetal mechanisms involved in the 'gating' of cortical SEPs during movement. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Burke,et al.  Conduction velocities of muscle and cutaneous afferents in the upper and lower limbs of human subjects. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  W. Jiang,et al.  Modulation of cutaneous cortical evoked potentials during isometric and isotonic contractions in the monkey , 1990, Brain Research.

[21]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Modification of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during tactile exploration and simple active and passive movements. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  The effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans. , 1991, Somatosensory & motor research.

[23]  C E Chapman,et al.  Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[24]  J M Weisenberger Vibrotactile temporal masking: effects of multiple maskers. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Wan Jiang,et al.  Factors influencing the perception of tactile stimuli during movement , 1996 .

[26]  W. McIlroy,et al.  SENSORI-SENSORY AFFERENT CONDITIONING WITH LEG MOVEMENT: GAIN CONTROL IN SPINAL REFLEX AND ASCENDING PATHS , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.