Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK

A growing body of literature discusses the CO2 emissions of cities. Still, little is known about emission patterns across density gradients from remote rural places to highly urbanized areas, the drivers behind those emission patterns and the global emissions triggered by consumption in human settlements—referred to here as the carbon footprint. In this letter we use a hybrid method for estimating the carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK explicitly linking global supply chains to local consumption activities and associated lifestyles. This analysis comprises all areas in the UK, whether rural or urban. We compare our consumption-based results with extended territorial CO2 emission estimates and analyse the driving forces that determine the carbon footprint of human settlements in the UK. Our results show that 90% of the human settlements in the UK are net importers of CO2 emissions. Consumption-based CO2 emissions are much more homogeneous than extended territorial emissions. Both the highest and lowest carbon footprints can be found in urban areas, but the carbon footprint is consistently higher relative to extended territorial CO2 emissions in urban as opposed to rural settlement types. The impact of high or low density living remains limited; instead, carbon footprints can be comparatively high or low across density gradients depending on the location-specific socio-demographic, infrastructural and geographic characteristics of the area under consideration. We show that the carbon footprint of cities and other human settlements in the UK is mainly determined by socio-economic rather than geographic and infrastructural drivers at the spatial aggregation of our analysis. It increases with growing income, education and car ownership as well as decreasing household size. Income is not more important than most other socio-economic determinants of the carbon footprint. Possibly, the relationship between lifestyles and infrastructure only impacts carbon footprints significantly at higher spatial granularity.

[1]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Developing a pragmatic approach to assess urban metobolism in Europe. A report to the European Environment Agency , 2011 .

[2]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  Geodemographics and the practices of geographic information science , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  A. Ramaswami,et al.  Two approaches to greenhouse gas emissions foot-printing at the city scale. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  A. Ramaswami,et al.  A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Perinaz Bhada-Tata,et al.  Cities and Climate Change: Responding to an Urgent Agenda , 2011 .

[6]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[7]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Identifying important characteristics of municipal carbon footprints , 2010 .

[8]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Carbon footprinting for climate change management in cities , 2011 .

[9]  J. Kok,et al.  The physics of wind-blown sand and dust , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[10]  Olli Salmi,et al.  Evaluating the carbon emissions of the low carbon city: A novel approach for consumer based allocation , 2013 .

[11]  Edgar Hertwich,et al.  Implementing Carbon‐Footprint‐Based Calculation Tools in Municipal Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2010 .

[12]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  A. Ramaswami,et al.  Progress toward low carbon cities: approaches for transboundary GHG emissions’ footprinting , 2011 .

[15]  E. Hertwich,et al.  The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action , 2009 .

[16]  Anu Ramaswami,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission Baselines for Global Cities and Metropolitan Regions , 2012 .

[17]  M. Havranek,et al.  Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities , 2010 .

[18]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Modeling, Monitoring, and Visualizing Carbon Footprints at the Urban Neighborhood Scale , 2011 .

[19]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas , 2011 .

[20]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Endogenising capital: a comparison of two methods , 2004 .

[21]  Angela Druckman,et al.  A geographically and socio-economically disaggregated local household consumption model for the UK , 2008 .

[22]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Decarbonizing urban transport in European cities: four cases show possibly high co-benefits , 2012 .

[23]  Michael S. Cross.  Local and Regional , 2015 .

[24]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Urban Climate Change Mitigation in Europe: Looking at and beyond the Role of Population Density , 2014 .

[25]  M. Chertow,et al.  Carbon Footprinting of Cities and Implications for Analysis of Urban Material and Energy Flows , 2012 .

[26]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[27]  Dominik Wiedenhofer.  Spatial and Socio-economic Drivers of Direct and Indirect Household Energy Consumption in Australia * , 2012 .

[28]  Helga Weisz,et al.  Physical and monetary input-output analysis: What makes the difference? , 2006 .

[29]  Giovanni Baiocchi,et al.  Time Use and Sustainability: An Input-Output Approach in Mixed Units , 2009 .

[30]  Sgouris Sgouridis,et al.  Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero Carbon Cities , 2011 .

[31]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Dense downtown living more carbon intense due to higher consumption: a case study of Helsinki , 2011 .

[32]  Aumnad Phdungsilp,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  J. Minx,et al.  Time-Use and Sustainability , 2009 .

[34]  T. Schelling.  Models of Segregation , 1969 .

[35]  Anu Ramaswami,et al.  Articulating a trans-boundary infrastructure supply chain greenhouse gas emission footprint for cities: Mathematical relationships and policy relevance , 2013 .

[36]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  The Impact of Social Factors and Consumer Behavior on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[37]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Cities and Automobile Dependence: A Sourcebook , 1989 .

[38]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint , 2008 .

[39]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Linking social expenditures to household lifestyles , 2003 .

[40]  Anu Ramaswami,et al.  Implementing Trans‐Boundary Infrastructure‐Based Greenhouse Gas Accounting for Delhi, India , 2012 .

[41]  Giovanni Baiocchi,et al.  Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions: a global perspective. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODELS – A CASE STUDY OF THE UK'S CARBON FOOTPRINT , 2010 .

[43]  Fanxin Meng,et al.  Using hybrid method to evaluate carbon footprint of Xiamen City, China , 2013 .

[44]  T. Wiedmann,et al.  General approaches for assessing urban environmental sustainability , 2012 .

[45]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A CARBON FOOTPRINT TIME SERIES OF THE UK – RESULTS FROM A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL , 2010 .

[46]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Case study on the carbon consumption of two metropolitan cities , 2011 .

[47]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model , 2009 .

[48]  M. Lenzen,et al.  How City Dwellers Affect Their Resource Hinterland , 2009 .

[49]  Ling Feng,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting of Urban Residential Consumption: A Household Survey Based Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  Anu Ramaswami,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  G. Peters,et al.  APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING , 2009 .

[52]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  International flows of embodied CO2 with an application to aluminium and the EU ETS , 2011 .