The influence of platform service innovation on value co-creation activities and the network effect

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the properties of platform service innovation and its relationship to value co-creation activities and the network effect. This is done over the course of a platform’s evolution through three stages: emergence, expansion and maturity. Design/methodology/approach Based on grounded theory, this study adopts a multiple case study research design. An in-depth analysis of the case data is done using ATLAS.TI software. Findings At the emergence stage, platform service innovations focus on building infrastructure. Platform owners stimulate the network effect directly via platform service innovations, rather than indirectly via value co-creation activities. At the expansion stage, the platform service innovations focus on building relationships among platform owner and different sides of participants. Platform owners stimulate the network effect indirectly, via value co-creation activities, rather than directly via platform service innovations. At the maturity stage, platform service innovations focus on building an environment for the platform ecosystem. Platform owners stimulate the network effect indirectly, via value co-creation activities rather than directly. Originality/value This research contributes to the service innovation literature by exploring the properties of platform service innovation and its relationship to value co-creation activities and the network effect from a longitudinal perspective. The principal managerial implication is that platform managers need to consider the developmental stage of the platform, as a mismatching of stage of development (emergence/expansion/maturity) and focus (an orientation toward building infrastructure, relationships or environment) may lead to a failure to stimulate or enhance the network effect.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[5]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1993 .

[6]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[7]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[8]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Winner Take All: Competition, Strategy, and the Structure of Returns in the Internet Economy , 2005 .

[9]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[10]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[11]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Competition between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages , 2002 .

[12]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Exploring the Phenomenon of Customers' Desired Value Change in a Business-to-Business Context , 2002 .

[13]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Diomidis Spinellis,et al.  A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies , 2004, CSUR.

[15]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Open Source Software Development - Just Another Case of Collective Invention? , 2004 .

[16]  Das Narayandas,et al.  Invited Commentaries on "Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing" , 2004 .

[17]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[18]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[19]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[21]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[22]  Ireland Forfás.  Services Innovation in Ireland - Options for Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[23]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[24]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[25]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[26]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Innovation in Experiential Services - An Empirical View , 2007 .

[27]  Scott E. Sampson,et al.  Foundations and Implications of a Proposed Unified Services Theory , 2006 .

[28]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Catalyst Code: The Strategies Behind the World's Most Dynamic Companies , 2007 .

[29]  K. Weick.  The Generative Properties Of Richness , 2007 .

[30]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[31]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Toward a Theory of Competencies for the Management of Product Complexity: Six Case Studies , 2008 .

[32]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[33]  David S. Evans,et al.  How Catalysts Ignite: The Economics of Platform-Based Start-Ups , 2009 .

[34]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  A. Gawer.  Platform Dynamics and Strategies: From Products to Services , 2009 .

[36]  Andrei Hagiu.  Two-Sided Platforms: Product Variety and Pricing Structures , 2009 .

[37]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[38]  Jose Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete,et al.  On the identification of critical mass in Internet-based services subject to network effects , 2010 .

[39]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[40]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Crowd-Funding: Transforming Customers into Investors through Innovative Service Platforms , 2011 .

[41]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field , 2011 .

[42]  Lutz Kaufmann,et al.  HOW TO DEMONSTRATE RIGOR WHEN PRESENTING GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT LITERATURE , 2011 .

[43]  C. Mele,et al.  “Five Co‐s” in innovating: a practice‐based view , 2012 .

[44]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Health Care Customer Value Cocreation Practice Styles , 2012 .

[45]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  The Role of Personal Relationships in Facilitating Supply Chain Communications: A Qualitative Study , 2012 .

[46]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[47]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[48]  Alfredo Vittorio De Massis,et al.  The Role of Early Adopters in the Diffusion of New Products: Differences between Platform and Nonplatform Innovations , 2014 .

[49]  A. Gawer.  Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[50]  Christoph F. Breidbach,et al.  Beyond virtuality: from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems , 2014 .

[51]  David Gann,et al.  Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context , 2014 .

[52]  Laurent Muzellec,et al.  Two-sided Internet Platforms: A Business Model Lifecycle Perspective , 2015 .

[53]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective , 2015 .

[54]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Modes of service innovation: a typology , 2015, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[55]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  Unpaid Crowd Complementors: The Platform Network Effect Mirage , 2014 .

[56]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Strategic orientations and mass customisation capability: the moderating effect of product life cycle , 2015 .

[57]  Jin-Su Kang,et al.  Keystone effect on entry into two-sided markets: An analysis of the market entry of WiMAX , 2015 .

[58]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  Kevin Kelly,et al.  The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future , 2016 .