Subjective annoyance from noise compared with some directly measurable effects.

In epidemiological investigations of annoyance it is important to search for directly measurable effects that are associated with reports of annoyance. The relationship between reported experiences of annoyance, performance on an arithmetic test, and hormonal stress reactions was studied on 100 male students during acute exposure to 85 dB (A) of traffic noise in a laboratory setting. An association was demonstrated between reported feelings of annoyance, performance efficiency, and the subjects' experience of the influence of noise on their performance. The exposure to noise was found to affect performance more negatively in the more annoyed individuals. The results indicate that the annoyance-inclined individuals in a community may constitute a special risk group that will suffer more from the adverse effects of community noise.

[1]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Effect of Noise on an "Intellectual" Task , 1958 .

[2]  H. J. Jerison.  Performance on a Simple Vigilance Task in Noise and Quiet , 1957 .

[3]  Warren H. Teichner,et al.  NOISE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACH , 1963 .

[4]  James F. Park,et al.  Effects of noise level and difficulty of task in performing division. , 1963 .

[5]  H. B. Hovey.  Effects of General Distraction on the Higher Thought Processes , 1928 .

[6]  U. S. Euler,et al.  Improved technique for the fluorimetric estimation of catecholamines. , 1961, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[7]  A. K. Bartoshuk.  Electromyographic reactions to strong auditory stimulation as a function of alpha amplitude. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  Henry Angelino,et al.  Factors Influencing Routine Performance Under Noise: Ii. an Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of “Adjustment” , 1955 .

[9]  N. Burch,et al.  Personality correlates of catecholamine excretion under stress. , 1967, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[10]  B R Slater,et al.  Effects of noise on pupil performance. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[11]  M. Frankenhaeuser,et al.  Catecholamine Excretion as Related to Cognitive and Emotional Reaction Patterns , 1968, Psychosomatic medicine.

[12]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  INTERACTION OF NOISE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS AND SLEEP DEPRIVATION. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  C. Karlsson,et al.  Analysis of urinary catecholamines: an improved auto-analyzer fluorescence method. , 1974, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[14]  D. Broadbent.  A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. , 1957, Psychological review.

[15]  D. Broadbent.  Noise, paced performance and vigilance tasks. , 1953, British journal of psychology.

[16]  Effects of high intensity noise on retention. , 1957 .

[17]  M. Frankenhaeuser,et al.  INTERINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN CATECHOLAMINE EXCRETION DURING STRESS , 1965 .

[18]  U. Lundberg,et al.  Immediate and delayed effects of noise on performance and arousal. , 1974, Biological psychology.

[19]  D. Hebb.  Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). , 1955, Psychological review.

[20]  M Frankenhaeuser,et al.  Behavior and circulating catecholamines. , 1971, Brain research.