The importance of numerical simulation in hydraulic components design is rapidly increasing. In fact, the computational simulations of compressible and incompressible flows can relevantly support experiments, and the CFD is becoming a valuable tool also for the design and the pre-prototyping processes (Yang, 2002, 2005; Barman, 2005). Moreover, the human and computational resources to be involved in the numerical analysis are now not only acceptable, but also advantageous, thanks to the continuous development of computational platforms, as well as of the CFD tools. Nevertheless the accuracy and reliability of the numerical results must be addressed when approaching a new problem, since they demonstrated to be very sensitive to the fluiddynamics characteristics of the case studied (such as the Reynolds number in the critical sections, the geometry complexity and the boundary conditions). For example, the widely used cylindrical orifices (metering valves, directional valves, injectors, instruments, etc.) show that the fluid dynamic performance is significantly affected by the geometrical details; consequently, a sharp-edge inlet presents an efflux coefficient lower than a rounded one (Ohrn et al., 1991), while small modifications in the curvature can determine remarkable differences both in the flow field, and in pressure losses. Furthermore, a key feature in the design process of fluid power components and systems is the capability of controlling or avoiding cavitation and aeration. The problems caused by the cavitating phenomena are widely known (Oshima & Ichikawa, 1985, 1986) and they can lead to efficiency loss, vibrations and noise, unexpected change in the characteristics of flow rate and flow forces and even erosion of the components when the phenomenon becomes particularly aggressive (Oshima e al., 2001). Therefore, the possibility of predicting cavitation is fundamental in hydraulic components design and both experiments and numerical simulation have to be employed and integrated in order to help the understanding of the basics of cavitation occurrence. Particularly, numerical analysis can provide a great amount of data that can extend the experimental area and deepen the insight of the physical phenomenon (Yang, 2002, 2005). Nevertheless, the accuracy and reliability of the numerical models have to be addressed when approaching a new problem or when they are modified to account for a more detailed description of the physical process. The model sensitivity with respect to the fluid-dynamics characteristics of the case studied (such as the Reynolds number in the critical sections, the geometry
[1]
T. N. Stevenson,et al.
Fluid Mechanics
,
2021,
Nature.
[2]
Tsuneo Ichikawa,et al.
Cavitation Phenomena and Performance of Oil Hydraulic Poppet Valve : 1st Report, Mechanism of Generation of Cavitation and Flow Performance
,
1985
.
[3]
Raul Payri,et al.
A Numerical Study of the Influence of Diesel Nozzle Geometry on the Inner Cavitating Flow
,
2002
.
[4]
R. Yang.
CFD Simulations of Oil Flow and Flow Induced Forces Inside Hydraulic Valves
,
2002
.
[5]
F. Menter.
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
,
1994
.
[6]
F. Menter.
ZONAL TWO EQUATION k-w TURBULENCE MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC FLOWS
,
1993
.
[7]
G. Yadigaroglu,et al.
On the various forms of the conservation equations in two-phase flow
,
1976
.
[8]
R. Weiss.
The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon in water and seawater
,
1970
.
[9]
Roger Yang,et al.
Predicting Hydraulic Valve Pressure Drop Using CFD
,
2005
.
[10]
D. Wilcox.
Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models
,
1988
.
[11]
K. Ramamurthi,et al.
Characteristics of flow through small sharp-edged cylindrical orifices
,
1999
.
[12]
F. Menter.
Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows
,
1992
.
[13]
Arthur H. Lefebvre,et al.
GEOMETRICAL EFFECTS ON DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS FOR PLAIN-ORIFICE ATOMIZERS
,
1991
.
[14]
Hrvoje Jasak,et al.
Development of a Generalized Grid Mesh Interface for Turbomachinery simulations with OpenFOAM
,
2008
.
[15]
Priyatosh Barman.
Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Analysis to Optimize the Pump Suction Line Configuration of a Hydraulic Control System
,
2002
.
[16]
B. Launder,et al.
Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc
,
1974
.
[17]
Matti Linjama,et al.
Effect of Cavitation in Water Hydraulic Poppet Valves
,
2001
.