Robust global detection of forced changes in mean and extreme precipitation despite observational disagreement on the magnitude of change

. Detection and attribution (D&A) of forced precipitation change is challenging due to internal variability and limited spatial and temporal coverage of observational records. These factors result in a low signal-to-noise ratio of potential regional and even global trends. Here, we use a statistical method – ridge regression – to create physically interpretable fingerprints for detection of forced changes in mean and extreme precipitation with a high signal-to-noise ratio. The fingerprints are con- 5 structed using CMIP6 multi-model output masked to match coverage of three gridded precipitation observational datasets – GHCNDEX, HadEX3, and GPCC –, and are then applied to these observational datasets to assess the degree of forced change detectable in the real-world climate. We show that the signature of forced change is detected in all three observational datasets for global metrics of mean and extreme precipitation. Forced changes are still detectable from changes in the spatial patterns of precipitation even if the global 10 mean trend is removed from the data. This shows detection of forced change in mean and extreme precipitation beyond a global mean trend, and increases confidence in the detection method’s power, as well as in climate models’ ability to capture the relevant processes that contribute to large-scale patterns of change. We also find, however, that detectability depends on the observational dataset used. Not only coverage differences but also observational uncertainty contribute to dataset disagreement, exemplified by times of emergence of forced change from internal 15 variability ranging from 1998 to 2004 among datasets. Furthermore, different choices for the period over which the forced trend is computed result in different levels of agreement between observations and model projections. These sensitivities may explain apparent contradictions in recent studies on whether models under- or overestimate the observed forced increase in mean and extreme precipitation. Lastly, the detection fingerprints are found to rely primarily on the signal in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere, which is at least partly due to observational coverage, but potentially also due to the presence of a more robust 20 signal in the Northern Hemisphere in general. Modelling, model output. CMIP, Intercomparison development software in partnership Data? The case of uncertainty in prediction of trends in and

[1]  A. Levermann,et al.  Changes in mean and extreme precipitation scale universally with global mean temperature across and within climate models , 2022 .

[2]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Revisiting future extreme precipitation trends in the Mediterranean , 2021, Weather and climate extremes.

[3]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Quantifying the human influence on the intensity of extreme 1- and 5-day precipitation amounts at global, continental, and regional scales , 2021, Journal of Climate.

[4]  A. Hall,et al.  Anthropogenic influence on extreme precipitation over global land areas seen in multiple observational datasets , 2021, Nature Communications.

[5]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Changes in Annual Extremes of Daily Temperature and Precipitation in CMIP6 Models , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[6]  P. Gleckler,et al.  Characterization of long period return values of extreme daily temperature and precipitation in the CMIP6 models: Part 1, model evaluation , 2020, Weather and Climate Extremes.

[7]  A. Pendergrass The Global‐Mean Precipitation Response to CO2‐Induced Warming in CMIP6 Models , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[8]  R. Allan,et al.  Development of an Updated Global Land In Situ‐Based Data Set of Temperature and Precipitation Extremes: HadEX3 , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[9]  B. Santer,et al.  Human influence on joint changes in temperature, rainfall and continental aridity , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[10]  Xuebin Zhang,et al.  Determining the Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Contribution to the Observed Intensification of Extreme Precipitation , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  Xuebin Zhang,et al.  Human influence has intensified extreme precipitation in North America , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J. Hurrell,et al.  Indicator Patterns of Forced Change Learned by an Artificial Neural Network , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[13]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Climate change now detectable from any single day of weather at global scale , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[14]  J. Hurrell,et al.  Viewing Forced Climate Patterns Through an AI Lens , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[15]  E. Hawkins,et al.  Observed Emergence of the Climate Change Signal: From the Familiar to the Unknown , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[16]  F. Vinet,et al.  Detection and attribution of flood trends in Mediterranean basins , 2019, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[17]  T. Knutson,et al.  Model Assessment of Observed Precipitation Trends over Land Regions: Detectable Human Influences and Possible Low Bias in Model Trends , 2018, Journal of Climate.

[18]  C. Deser,et al.  Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  E. Fischer,et al.  Models are likely to underestimate increase in heavy rainfall in the extratropical regions with high rainfall intensity , 2017 .

[20]  E. Fischer,et al.  Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation , 2017 .

[21]  U. Schneider,et al.  Evaluating the Hydrological Cycle over Land Using the Newly-Corrected Precipitation Climatology from the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) , 2017 .

[22]  P. Stott,et al.  Detection and attribution of human influence on regional precipitation , 2016 .

[23]  E. Fischer,et al.  Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models , 2016 .

[24]  T. Mauritsen,et al.  Understanding the Intermodel Spread in Global-Mean Hydrological Sensitivity* , 2016 .

[25]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[26]  P. O’Gorman,et al.  The Response of Precipitation Minus Evapotranspiration to Climate Warming: Why the “Wet-Get-Wetter, Dry-Get-Drier” Scaling Does Not Hold over Land , 2015 .

[27]  E. Fischer,et al.  The timing of anthropogenic emergence in simulated climate extremes , 2015 .

[28]  D. Rowell,et al.  Understanding uncertainties in future projections of seasonal tropical precipitation. , 2015 .

[29]  E. Fischer,et al.  Models agree on forced response pattern of precipitation and temperature extremes , 2014 .

[30]  F. Giorgi,et al.  A consistent picture of the hydroclimatic response to global warming from multiple indices: Models and observations , 2014 .

[31]  K. Cowtan,et al.  Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends , 2014 .

[32]  A. Aghakouchak,et al.  Evaluation of CMIP5 continental precipitation simulations relative to satellite‐based gauge‐adjusted observations , 2014 .

[33]  E. Fischer,et al.  Detection of spatially aggregated changes in temperature and precipitation extremes , 2014 .

[34]  D. Hartmann,et al.  The Atmospheric Energy Constraint on Global-Mean Precipitation Change , 2014 .

[35]  A. Bodas‐Salcedo,et al.  Physically Consistent Responses of the Global Atmospheric Hydrological Cycle in Models and Observations , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[36]  Fubao Sun,et al.  A general framework for understanding the response of the water cycle to global warming over land and ocean , 2013 .

[37]  K. Marvel,et al.  Identifying external influences on global precipitation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Francis W. Zwiers,et al.  Attributing intensification of precipitation extremes to human influence , 2013 .

[39]  P. Stott,et al.  Anthropogenic impact on Earth's hydrological cycle , 2013 .

[40]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation , 2013 .

[41]  R. Vose,et al.  Global Land-Based Datasets for Monitoring Climatic Extremes , 2013 .

[42]  P. Stott,et al.  Fingerprints of changes in annual and seasonal precipitation from CMIP5 models over land and ocean , 2012 .

[43]  H. Wernli,et al.  Quantifying the Relevance of Cyclones for Precipitation Extremes , 2012 .

[44]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Changes in seasonal land precipitation during the latter twentieth‐century , 2012 .

[45]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  Time of emergence of climate signals , 2012 .

[46]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent. , 2011, Journal of statistical software.

[47]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes , 2011, Nature.

[48]  C. Deser,et al.  Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[49]  M. Hoerling,et al.  Regional Precipitation Trends: Distinguishing Natural Variability from Anthropogenic Forcing , 2010 .

[50]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[51]  P. O'Gorman,et al.  The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[53]  M. Allen,et al.  Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle , 2002, Nature.

[54]  B. Santer,et al.  Detecting greenhouse-gas-induced climate change with an optimal fingerprint method , 1996 .

[55]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Towards the detection and attribution of an anthropogenic effect on climate , 1995 .