Re-examining the realization of provincial carbon dioxide emission intensity reduction targets in China from a consumption-based accounting

Abstract China’s administrative regions distribute their carbon dioxide emissions mitigation burdens differently. As a result of closer interregional economic connections, embodied carbon emissions are transferred among provinces via inter-provincial trade, resulting in carbon leakage. China usually adopts a production-based principle to evaluate the realization of carbon intensity reduction targets for disparate provinces. The carbon dioxide emission reduction targets from a consumption-based accounting were re-examined, and compared two methods that have been applied. From 2002 to 2007, the rankings of carbon dioxide emission intensity variation rates from production-based and consumption-based accounting resulted in different province rankings and, although the gaps in the rankings between both methods changed between 2007 and 2012, particularly in Guizhou and Yunnan. Because the production-based calculation ignores carbon leakage and is ineffective in accurately assessing reduction targets, these targets were re-examined from a consumption-based accounting. These findings are very significant for China’s policies on carbon dioxide emissions reduction: the provinces’ targets on reducing carbon dioxide emissions may be evaluated rationally with regard to inter-provincial carbon leakage in China; kinds of support for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions can favor less developed regions; and encouraging economic mechanics for technological innovations assist in managing carbon dioxide emissions at the national scale.

[1]  Qiaoling Liu,et al.  Sources and flows of China's virtual SO 2 emission transfers embodied in interprovincial trade: A multiregional input–output analysis , 2017 .

[2]  Yu Li,et al.  Multiregional Input-Output Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Evolution Driving Force for Carbon Emissions Embodied in Interprovincial Trade and Optimization Policies: Case Study of Northeast Industrial District in China. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Yong Geng,et al.  CO2 emissions from China's power sector at the provincial level:Consumption versus production perspectives , 2013 .

[4]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  CO2 Multipliers in Multi-region Input-Output Models , 2004 .

[5]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Ming Xu,et al.  Income-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nations. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Carbon and material footprints of a welfare state: Why and how governments should enhance green investments , 2018, Environmental Science & Policy.

[8]  Xi Ji,et al.  Embodied water analysis for Hebei Province, China by input-output modelling , 2018, Frontiers of Earth Science.

[9]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  What drives intersectoral CO2 emissions in China , 2016 .

[10]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities , 2017 .

[11]  Jie Guo,et al.  The key sectors for energy conservation and carbon emissions reduction in China: Evidence from the input-output method , 2018 .

[12]  Tsuyoshi Fujita,et al.  Embodied energy use in China's industrial sectors , 2012 .

[13]  Xueli Zhao,et al.  Tracing natural resource uses via China's supply chains , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Yan Yunfeng,et al.  China's foreign trade and climate change: A case study of CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[15]  Hitoshi Hayami,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Canada and Japan: Sector-Specific Estimates and Managerial and Economic Implications , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Jianping Ge,et al.  The Economy-Carbon Nexus in China: A Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis of the Influence of Sectoral and Regional Development , 2017 .

[17]  A. Chiu,et al.  Final production-based emissions of regions in China , 2018 .

[18]  S. Mader,et al.  Consumption-Based Versus Production-Based Accounting of CO2 Emissions: Is There Evidence for Carbon Leakage? , 2018 .

[19]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: A multi-region model for China , 2014 .

[20]  Guangwu Chen,et al.  City Carbon Footprint Networks , 2016 .

[21]  Hefa Cheng,et al.  Displacement efficiency of alternative energy and trans-provincial imported electricity in China , 2017, Nature Communications.

[22]  Fengnan Chen,et al.  Study of the potential of low carbon energy development and its contribution to realize the reduction target of carbon intensity in China , 2012 .

[23]  F. M. Pulselli,et al.  On the feasibility of a consumer-based allocation method in national GHG inventories , 2014 .

[24]  Can Wang,et al.  An index decomposition analysis of China's interregional embodied carbon flows , 2015 .

[25]  J. Heinonen,et al.  Emissions in a decarbonised economy? Global lessons from a carbon footprint analysis of Iceland , 2017 .

[26]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities , 2016 .

[27]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Yu Liu,et al.  Multiplicative structural decomposition and attribution analysis of carbon emission intensity in China, 2002–2012 , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[29]  Yingying Zeng,et al.  Electricity regulation in the Chinese national emissions trading scheme (ETS): lessons for carbon leakage and linkage with the EU ETS , 2018 .

[30]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Environmental and social footprints of international trade , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[31]  Ju’e Guo,et al.  China’s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in international and interprovincial trade , 2012 .

[32]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Chinese CO2 emission flows have reversed since the global financial crisis , 2017, Nature Communications.

[33]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  New multi-regional input–output databases for Australia – enabling timely and flexible regional analysis , 2017 .

[34]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Can China achieve its carbon intensity target by 2020 while sustaining economic growth , 2015 .

[35]  Yong Geng,et al.  The gigatonne gap in China’s carbon dioxide inventories , 2012 .

[36]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  A multi-regional input-output table mapping China's economic outputs and interdependencies in 2012 , 2018, Scientific Data.

[37]  Qiaoling Liu,et al.  Pathways to SO2 emissions reduction in China for 1995–2010: Based on decomposition analysis , 2013 .

[38]  Masanobu Ishikawa,et al.  An analysis of the driving forces of CO2 emissions embodied in Japan–China trade , 2010 .

[39]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Will Economic Restructuring in China Reduce Trade-Embodied CO2 Emissions? , 2014 .

[40]  Kebin He,et al.  Global climate forcing of aerosols embodied in international trade , 2016 .

[41]  Weidong Liu,et al.  Outsourcing CO2 within China , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.