Consilience and a hierarchy of species concepts: advances toward closure on the species puzzle.

Numerous concepts exist for biological species. This diversity of ideas derives from a number of sources ranging from investigative study of particular taxa and character sets to philosophical aptitude and world view to operationalism and nomenclatorial rules. While usually viewed as counterproductive, in reality these varied concepts can greatly enhance our efforts to discover and understand biological diversity. Moreover, this continued "turf war" and dilemma over species can be resolved if the various concepts are viewed in a hierarchical system and each evaluated for its inherent level of consilience. Under this paradigm a theoretically appropriate, highly consilient concept of species capable of colligating the abundant types of species diversity offers the best guidance for developing and employing secondary operational concepts for identifying diversity. Of all the concepts currently recognized, only the non-operational Evolutionary Species Concept corresponds to the requisite parameters and, therefore, should serve as the theoretical concept appropriate for the category Species. As operational concepts, the remaining ideas have been incompatible with one another in their ability to encompass species diversity because each has restrictive criteria as to what qualifies as a species. However, the operational concepts can complement one another and do serve a vital role under the Evolutionary Species Concept as fundamental tools necessary for discovering diversity compatible with the primary theoretical concept. Thus, the proposed hierarchical system of primary and secondary concepts promises both the most productive framework for mutual respect for varied concepts and the most efficient and effective means for revealing species diversity.

[1]  R. Waples.  Pacific Salmon, Oncorhynchus spp., and the Definition of "Species" Under the Endangered Species Act , 1991 .

[2]  E. Wiley,et al.  The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered , 1978 .

[3]  G. D,et al.  American Naturalist , 1867, Nature.

[4]  Michael T. Ghiselin,et al.  On Psychologism in the Logic of Taxonomic Controversies , 1966 .

[5]  A. Kluge,et al.  A CONSIDERATION OF EPISTEMOLOGY IN SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SPECIES , 1994 .

[6]  A. Cronquist.  Once again, what is a species?. , 1978 .

[7]  T. Dobzhansky.  Mendelian Populations and Their Evolution , 1950, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J Mallet,et al.  A species definition for the modern synthesis. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  E. Wiley.  Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics , 1981 .

[10]  D. Rosen.  Vicariant Patterns and Historical Explanation in Biogeography , 1978 .

[11]  Richard E. Blackwelder,et al.  Taxonomy: a Text and Reference Book , 1967 .

[12]  D. Hillis,et al.  Species in concept and practice : herpetological applications , 1990 .

[13]  T. Morrison-Scott,et al.  Principles of Animal Taxonomy , 1962, Nature.

[14]  Niles Eldredge,et al.  Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology , 1981 .

[15]  D. Hull.  Are Species Really Individuals , 1976 .

[16]  Robert M. Zink,et al.  Species Concepts in Ornithology , 1988 .

[17]  H. Dawah,et al.  Species :the units of biodiversity , 1997 .

[18]  Rudolf Meier,et al.  Species concepts and phylogenetic theory : a debate , 2000 .

[19]  L. V. Valen,et al.  Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks , 1976 .

[20]  A. Hrdliccaronka.  ORGANIC EVOLUTION. , 1930, Science.

[21]  K. Nixon,et al.  AN AMPLIFICATION OF THE PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES CONCEPT , 1990 .

[22]  John Alroy,et al.  Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy , 1990 .

[23]  Tod F. Stuessy,et al.  Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data , 2009 .

[24]  R. Mayden,et al.  Systematics, species concepts, and the evolutionarily significant unit in biodiversity and conservation biology , 1995 .

[25]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  CRITERIA FOR GENERA, SPECIES, AND SUBSPECIES IN ZOOLOGY AND PALEOZOOLOGY , 1943 .

[26]  I. Tattersall.  Metaphysics and the origin of species , 1998 .

[27]  G. Shull.  THE SPECIES CONCEPT FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF A GENETICIST , 1923 .

[28]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  Principles of systematic zoology , 1969 .

[29]  P. Sneath,et al.  PHENETIC TAXONOMY AT THE SPECIES LEVEL AND ABOVE , 1976 .

[30]  H. Paterson,et al.  Evolution and the Recognition Concept of Species: Collected Writings , 1992 .

[31]  Mark Ridley,et al.  The cladistic solution to the species problem , 1989 .

[32]  M. Ghiselin.  A Radical Solution to the Species Problem , 1974 .