Decentralized Social Networking Using Named-Data

Online social networks (OSNs) can be considered as huge success. However, this success costs users their privacy and loosing ownership of their own data; Sometimes the operators of social networking sites, have some business incentives adverse to users’ expectations of privacy. These sort of privacy breaches have inspired research toward privacy-preserving alternatives for social networking in a decentralized fashion. Yet almost all alternatives lack proper feasibility and efficiency, which is because of a huge mismatch between aforementioned goal and today’s network’s means of achieving it. Current Internet architecture is showing signs of age. Among a variety of proposed directions for a new Internet architecture is Named Data Networking (NDN), focused on retrieving content by name, which names packets rather than end-hosts. NDN characteristics greatly facilitate development of applications tailored for today’s needs. In this paper a decentralized architecture for social networking is proposed that provides strong privacy guarantees while preserving the main functionalities of OSNs, in a content-based paradigm. The simulation results show that not only it is feasible to have decentralized social networking over content centric networks, but also it is significantly more efficient from a global network point of view.

[1]  Mehdi Mani,et al.  SCOPE: A prototype for spontaneous P2P social networking , 2010, 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops).

[2]  Ramón Cáceres,et al.  Privacy, cost, and availability tradeoffs in decentralized OSNs , 2009, WOSN '09.

[3]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[4]  Nikita Borisov,et al.  FlyByNight: mitigating the privacy risks of social networking , 2008, WPES '08.

[5]  Van Jacobson,et al.  Networking named content , 2009, CoNEXT '09.

[6]  Prateek Mittal,et al.  DECENT: A decentralized architecture for enforcing privacy in online social networks , 2011, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[7]  Scott Shenker,et al.  A data-oriented (and beyond) network architecture , 2007, SIGCOMM 2007.

[8]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook , 2009, WOSN '09.

[9]  Honggang Zhang,et al.  The growth of Diaspora - A decentralized online social network in the wild , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM Workshops.

[10]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Sharing social content from home: a measurement-driven feasibility study , 2011, NOSSDAV.

[11]  Refik Molva,et al.  Safebook: Feasibility of transitive cooperation for privacy on a decentralized social network , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks & Workshops.

[12]  Nikita Borisov,et al.  Cachet: a decentralized architecture for privacy preserving social networking with caching , 2012, CoNEXT '12.