Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation

Most ads in practice receive no more than a single eye fixation. This study investigates the limits of what ads can communicate under such adverse exposure conditions. We find that consumers already know at maximum levels of accuracy and with high degree of certainty whether something is an ad or is editorial material after an exposure of less than 100 milliseconds and---if the ad is typical---which product is being advertised. Even after an extremely coarse visual presentation of 100 milliseconds, the product and brand in typical ads are identified well above chance levels, with atypical ads doing slightly better at the brand level. We propose a new metric that quantifies how effectively individual ads communicate their gist in adverse exposure conditions and that predicts the immediate interest that ads draw. Bayesian mediation analyses show that because of their better gist performance, typical ads rather than atypical ones raise immediate interest after very brief exposures. These findings challenge some of the received knowledge in advertising theory and practice, and they reveal the immediate communication benefits of typical ads.

[1]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Neurobiology of Attention , 2005 .

[3]  Erin M. Harley,et al.  How different spatial-frequency components contribute to visual information acquisition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice , 2006 .

[5]  Abel G. Oliva,et al.  Gist of a scene , 2005 .

[6]  D. Mick,et al.  Levels of Subjective Comprehension in Advertising Processing and Their Relations to Ad Perceptions, Attitudes, and Memory , 1992 .

[7]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads , 1999 .

[8]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[9]  L. Peracchio,et al.  The Role of Thin-Slice Judgments in Consumer Psychology , 2006 .

[10]  Xiaojing Yang,et al.  Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising , 2007 .

[11]  Christopher M. Harris,et al.  The distribution of fixation durations in infants and naive adults , 1988, Vision Research.

[12]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Subjective confidence in one's answers: the consensuality principle. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  P. Winkielman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind , 2022 .

[14]  Kajal Lahiri,et al.  Bayesian analysis of nested logit model by Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2002 .

[15]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[16]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[17]  Michel Wedel,et al.  The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity , 2010 .

[18]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior , 1998 .

[19]  Xiaojing Yang,et al.  Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[20]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Sales Effects of Attention to Feature Advertisements: A Bayesian Mediation Analysis , 2009 .

[22]  Z. Kunda,et al.  When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action , 2007 .

[24]  N. Ambady,et al.  Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. , 1993 .

[25]  Peter J. Danaher,et al.  Optimal Internet Media Selection , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[26]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[27]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Object detection and basic-level categorization: Sometimes you know it is there before you know what it is , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  R. C. Goodstein.  Category-based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing , 1993 .

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[30]  M. Bar.  Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  The Comprehension/Miscomprehension of Print Communication: Selected Findings , 1989 .

[32]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot , 2002 .

[33]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  The limits of visual resolution in natural scene viewing , 2005 .

[34]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects , 2004 .

[35]  S. Ratneshwar,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion , 1997 .

[36]  Paige E. Scalf,et al.  Competition in Visual Cortex Impedes Attention to Multiple Items , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  K. Lamberts.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000, Psychological review.

[42]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[43]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. , 2009, Psychological review.

[44]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[45]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories , 1999 .

[46]  P. Silvia.  Interest—The Curious Emotion , 2008 .

[47]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? , 2005 .

[48]  D. Stapel,et al.  Affects of the Unexpected: When Inconsistency Feels Good (or Bad) , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[49]  Ralf van der Lans,et al.  Research Note - Competitive Brand Salience , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[50]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..