Perception of Culture-specific Gaze Behaviors of Agents and Gender Effects

Gaze plays an important role in human-human communication. Adequate gaze control of a virtual agent is also essential for successful and believable human-agent interaction. Researchers on HAI have developed gaze control models by taking account of gaze duration, frequency, and timing of gaze aversion. However, cultural differences in gaze behaviors have not been focused enough. We aimed to investigate cultural differences in gaze behaviors and their perception by developing virtual agents with Japanese gaze behaviors, American gaze behaviors, and fixed gaze behaviors. We then compared their effects on the impressions of the agents and interactions. Our first experimental results with Japanese participants suggested that the impression of the agent is affected by participants' shyness and familiarity of the gaze patterns performed by the agent. This paper reports the results of our second experiment that investigated the effects of the gender of agents and the gender of participants on perception of culture-specific gaze behaviors. The preliminary results suggests there are differences between the gender of participants and agents on the perception of favorable gaze behaviors. The female participants had a better impression on the agent of the same gender that performed the American gaze behavior, while the male participants preferred the agents with the Japanese gaze behavior. These results indicate favorable gaze behaviors vary according to users' gender and agents' gender.

[1]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[2]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Ryo Ishii,et al.  Avatar ' s Gaze Control to Facilitate Conversation in Virtual-Space Multi-User Voice Chat System , 2019 .

[4]  J. Cassell,et al.  Turn Taking versus Discourse Structure , 1999 .

[5]  Tomoko Koda,et al.  Development and Perception Evaluation of Culture-Specific Gaze Behaviors of Virtual Agents , 2017, IVA.

[6]  Mohammad Obaid,et al.  Cultural Behaviors of Virtual Agents in an Augmented Reality Environment , 2012, IVA.

[7]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Avatar culture: cross-cultural evaluations of avatar facial expressions , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[8]  Manas K. Mandal,et al.  Understanding Facial Expressions in Communication , 2015 .

[9]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Tactical Language and Culture Training Systems: Using Artificial Intelligence to Teach Foreign Languages and Cultures , 2008, AAAI.

[10]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Bossy or Wimpy: Expressing Social Dominance by Combining Gaze and Linguistic Behaviors , 2010, IVA.

[11]  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF VISUAL BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL INTERACTION , 1977 .

[12]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  Brent Lance,et al.  The Rickel Gaze Model: A Window on the Mind of a Virtual Human , 2007, IVA.

[14]  Matthew A. Paul,et al.  Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Hung-Hsuan Huang,et al.  From observation to simulation: generating culture-specific behavior for interactive systems , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[16]  David G. Novick,et al.  A Computational Model of Culture-Specific Conversational Behavior , 2007, IVA.

[17]  U. Hess,et al.  An Ingroup Advantage for Confidence in Emotion Recognition Judgments: The Moderating Effect of Familiarity With the Expressions of Outgroup Members , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson,et al.  Animating Idle Gaze in Public Places , 2009, IVA.

[19]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Modeling culture in intelligent virtual agents , 2016, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[20]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  A Review of Eye Gaze in Virtual Agents, Social Robotics and HCI: Behaviour Generation, User Interaction and Perception , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[21]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  In-Group Advantage and Other-Group Bias in Facial Emotion Recognition , 2015 .