Measuring the abruptness of patchy ecotones – A simulation-based comparison of landscape pattern statistics

The use of statistics of landscape pattern to infer ecological process at ecotones requires knowledge of the specific sensitivities of statistics to ecotone characteristics. In this study, sets of patch-based and boundary-based statistics were evaluated to assess their suitability as measures of abruptness on simulated ecotone landscapes. We generated 50 realizations each for 25 groups of ecotones that varied systematically in their degree of abruptness and patchiness. Factorial ANOVA was used to evaluate the sensitivity of statistics to the known differences among the simulated groups. Suitability of each index for measuring abruptness was evaluated using the ANOVA results. The statistics were then ranked in order of their suitability as abruptness statistics based on their sensitivity to abruptness, the consistency of the relationship, and their lack of sensitivity to patchiness. The two best statistics for quantifying abruptness were those we developed based on lattice delineation methods, and are called cumulative boundary elements and boundary element dispersion. The results of this research provide support for studies of ecotone process that rely on the interpretation of patch or boundary statistics.

[1]  M. Dale,et al.  Subarctic forest‐tundra vegetation gradients: The sigmoid wave hypothesis , 1993 .

[2]  László Orlóci,et al.  Edge detection in vegetation: Jornada revisited , 1990 .

[3]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[4]  J. Wilson,et al.  Positive-feedback Switches in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[5]  C. Johnston,et al.  Quantitative Methods for Studying Landscape Boundaries , 1992 .

[6]  Daniel G. Brown A Spectral Unmixing Approach to Leaf Area Index (LAI) Estimation at the Alpine Treeline Ecotone , 2001 .

[7]  David R. Butler,et al.  TREE-TUNDRA COMPETITIVE HIERARCHIES, SOIL FERTILITY GRADIENTS, AND TREELINE ELEVATION IN GLACIER NATIONAL PARK, MONTANA , 1994 .

[8]  M. Fortin,et al.  Delineation of Ecological Boundaries: Comparison of Approaches and Significance Tests , 1995 .

[9]  R. Sokal,et al.  Detecting Regions of Abrupt Change in Maps of Biological Variables , 1989 .

[10]  Geoffrey M. Jacquez,et al.  From fields to objects: A review of geographic boundary analysis , 2000, J. Geogr. Syst..

[11]  J. M. Cornelius,et al.  Locating Discontinuities along Ecological Gradients , 1987 .

[12]  Daniel G. Brown,et al.  Classification and Boundary Vagueness in Mapping Presettlement Forest Types , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  William L. Baker,et al.  The r.le programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[15]  J. Gosz,et al.  Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems , 1985 .

[16]  G. K. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Statistical Concepts And Methods , 1978 .

[17]  A. D. Armand Sharp and Gradual Mountain Timberlines as a Result of Species Interaction , 1992 .

[18]  M. Kent,et al.  Landscape and plant community boundaries in biogeography , 1997 .

[19]  A. D. Armand,et al.  Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. , 1992 .

[20]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Edge detection algorithms for two-dimensional ecological data , 1993 .

[21]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Analysis and representation of vegetation continua from Landsat Thematic Mapper data for lowland heaths , 1989 .

[22]  T. Allen,et al.  Spatial and compositional pattern of alpine treeline, Glacier National Park, Montana , 1996 .

[23]  W. Baker,et al.  Landscape Analysis of the Forest-Tundra Ecotone in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado* , 1995, The Professional Geographer.

[24]  Galina Churkina,et al.  Dynamics and forms of ecotone of under the impact of climatic change: mathematical approach , 1995 .

[25]  W. H. Womble,et al.  Differential systematics. , 1951, Science.