The Pragmatic Roots of Context

When modelling complex systems one can not include all the causal factors, but one has to settle for partial models. This is alright if the factors left out are either so constant that they can be ignored or one is able to recognise the circumstances when they will be such that the partial model applies. The transference of knowledge from the point of application to the point of learning utilises a combination of recognition and inference - a simple model of the important features is learnt and later situations where inferences can be drawn from the model are recognised. Context is an abstraction of the collection of background features that are later recognised. Different heuristics for recognition and model formulation will be effective for different learning tasks. Each of these will lead to a different type of context. Given this, there two ways of modelling context: one can either attempt to investigate the contexts that arise out of the heuristics that a particular agent actually applies or one can attempt to model context using the external source of regularity that the heuristics exploit. There are also two basic methodologies for the investigation of context: a top-down approach where one tries to lay down general, a priori principles and a bottom-up approach where one can try and find what sorts of context arise by experiment and simulation. A simulation is exhibited which is designed to illustrate the practicality of the bottom-up approach in elucidating the sorts of internal context that arise in an artificial agent which is attempting to learn simple models of a complex environment.

[1]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Context as a Spurious Concept , 1997, ArXiv.

[2]  R. Palmer,et al.  Artificial economic life: a simple model of a stockmarket , 1994 .

[3]  J. McCarthy A LOGICAL AI APPROACH TO CONTEXT , 1995 .

[4]  Bruce Edmonds A Simple-Minded Network Model with Context-like Objects , 1997 .

[5]  Varol Akman,et al.  Steps Toward Formalizing Context , 1996, AI Mag..

[6]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[7]  A. Clark,et al.  Genic Representation: Reconciling Content and Causal Complexity , 1999, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[8]  Lucja Iwanska,et al.  Context in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language , 1998, AI Mag..

[9]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Learning One More Thing , 1994, IJCAI.

[10]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Modeling Socially Intelligent Agents , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  P. Bak,et al.  Learning from mistakes , 1997, Neuroscience.

[12]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Causality in Complex Systems , 1999 .

[13]  Varol Akman Context as a Social Construct , 1997 .

[14]  B. Edmonds Modelling Bounded Rationality in Agent-Based Simulations Using the Evolution of Mental Models , 1999 .

[15]  Cheryl Achterberg,et al.  Contexts in context , 1988 .

[16]  Gary L. Drescher,et al.  Made-up minds - a constructivist approach to artificial intelligence , 1991 .

[17]  Jari Vaario,et al.  Artificial Life as Constructivist AI (知能システム ) , 1994 .

[18]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Capturing Social Embeddedness: A Constructivist Approach , 1999, Adapt. Behav..

[19]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  SDML: A Multi-Agent Language for Organizational Modelling , 1998, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.