Capital accumulation under technological progress and learning: A vintage capital approach

Abstract In standard capital accumulation models all capital goods are equally productive and produce goods of the same quality. However, due to technological progress, in reality it holds most of the time that newer capital goods are either more productive (process innovation) or produce goods of better quality (product innovation). Implications of process innovation for the firm’s investment policies are investigated while the output price development is subject to a business cycle, and a given generation of capital goods gets more productive over time due to learning. The problem is turned into an optimal control model that distinguishes the vintages of capital goods, and where, unlike most of the recent contributions, it is possible to keep on investing in older technologies. It is shown that (i) learning is one of the reasons why a firm may invest in old technologies even when apparently superior technologies are available, (ii) investments in machines of a given age increase more over time under faster technological progress, (iii) under faster technological progress investments are more vulnerable to output price developments, and (iv), on average, machines are older during recessions. In deciding whether to invest in newer or older capital goods, also the lower productivity due to aging versus differences in cost of discounting and acquisition have to be taken into account.

[1]  M Brokate,et al.  Pontryagin's principle for control problems in age-dependent population dynamics , 1985, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Dynamic Policies of the Firm: An Optimal Control Approach , 1992 .

[3]  M. Yorukoglu,et al.  The Information Technology Productivity Paradox , 1998 .

[4]  Robert E. Lucas,et al.  Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Accounting for Growth , 1998 .

[6]  S. Nickell The investment decisions of firms , 1979 .

[7]  J. P. Gould Adjustment Costs in the Theory of Investment of the Firm , 1968 .

[8]  M. Tombak,et al.  Strategic timing of adoption of new technologies under uncertainty , 1994 .

[9]  Jacques Lesourne,et al.  Adaptive strategies of the firm through a business cycle , 1983 .

[10]  A. Haurie,et al.  Infinite Horizon Optimal Control , 1987 .

[11]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  Differential-difference equations in economics: On the numerical solution of vintage capital growth models , 1997 .

[12]  James Tobin,et al.  Neoclassical Growth with Fixed Factor Proportions , 1966 .

[13]  Emilio Barucci,et al.  Optimal Investments with Increasing Returns to Scale , 1998 .

[14]  Robert J. Gordon,et al.  The measurement of durable goods prices , 1991 .

[15]  Robert Dekle A note on growth accounting with vintage capital , 2001 .

[16]  A. Xepapadeas,et al.  Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital , 1999 .

[17]  Gustav Feichtinger,et al.  Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse : Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften , 1986 .

[18]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Strategic technology investment under uncertainty , 2002, OR Spectr..

[19]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis , 1968 .

[20]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Dynamic Investment Behavior Taking into Account Ageing of the Capital Good , 2001 .

[21]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  Endogenous vs exogenously driven fluctuations in vintage capital models , 1999 .

[22]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Financially constrained capital investments: The effects of disembodied and embodied technological progress , 2008 .

[23]  G. Grossman,et al.  Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth , 1989 .

[24]  James M. Malcomson,et al.  Replacement and the rental value of capital equipment subject to obsolescence , 1975 .

[25]  Vladimir M. Veliov Newton's method for problems of optimal control of heterogeneous systems , 2003, Optim. Methods Softw..

[26]  Jacques Lesourne,et al.  The firm's investment and employment policy through a business cycle , 1980 .

[27]  Lutz Hendricks,et al.  Equipment Investment and Growth In Developing Countries , 2000 .

[28]  R. Boucekkine,et al.  Numerical solution by iterative methods of a class of vintage capital models , 2001 .

[29]  Emilio Barucci,et al.  Investment in a vintage capital model , 1998 .

[30]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  TOBIN'S MARGINAL q AND AVERAGE q: A NEOCLASSICAL INTERPRETATION , 1982 .

[31]  Benteng Zou,et al.  Vintage technology, optimal investment and technology adoption , 2006 .

[32]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Vintage Capital and Inequality , 1998 .

[33]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  Creative Destruction, Investment Volatility, and the Average Age of Capital , 1998 .

[34]  John C. Williams,et al.  Putty-clay and investment: a business cycle analysis , 1998 .

[35]  Raouf Boucekkine,et al.  General Equilibrium Vintage Capital Growth Models Displaying Periodic Solutions: A Theoretical Example , 1996 .

[36]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Vintage capital, investment, and growth , 1991 .

[37]  Per Krusell,et al.  Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change , 1995 .

[38]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Optimal Control of an Age-Structured Population Model with Applications to Social Services Planning , 1983 .

[39]  Richard Harris,et al.  Non-Convexities in Continuous- Time Investment Theory , 1981 .

[40]  Vladimir M. Veliov,et al.  Optimality conditions for age-structured control systems☆ , 2003 .

[41]  Varadarajan V. Chari,et al.  Vintage Human Capital, Growth, and the Diffusion of New Technology , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  Emilio Barucci,et al.  Technology adoption and accumulation in a vintage-capital model , 2001 .

[43]  Vladimir M. Veliov,et al.  Age-specific dynamic labor demand and human capital investment , 2007 .