The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength.

Bone's mechanical competence and its fragility in particular depend to a certain extent on the structure and microstructure of the cortical bone compartment. Beyond bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content, a variety of other features of cortical bone contribute to whole bone's resistance to fracture. Structural properties of cortical bone most commonly employed as surrogate for its mechanical competence include thickness of the cortex, cortical cross-sectional area and area moment of inertia. But microstructural properties such as cortical porosity, crystallinity or the presence of microcracks also contribute to bone's mechanical competence. Microcracks in particular not only weaken the cortical bone tissue but also provide an effective mechanism for energy dissipation. Bone is a damageable, viscoelastic composite and most of all a living material capable of self-repair and thus exhibits a complex repertoire of mechanical properties. This review provides an overview of a variety of features of cortical bone known to provide mechanical competence and how these features may be applied for fracture risk prediction.

[1]  S. Beer,et al.  Strength , 1875, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[2]  F Eckstein,et al.  Mechanical strength of the proximal femur as predicted from geometric and densitometric bone properties at the lower limb versus the distal radius. , 2002, Bone.

[3]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[4]  Fran Harris,et al.  Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  Xiaodu Wang,et al.  The Toughness of Cortical Bone and Its Relationship with Age , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  P Zioupos,et al.  The role of collagen in the declining mechanical properties of aging human cortical bone. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  The role of collagen in determining bone mechanical properties , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of bone mineral at appendicular sites in females with fractures of the proximal femur. , 1998, Bone.

[10]  C Milgrom,et al.  Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. , 1995, Bone.

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  Microdamage and bone strength , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  A Hofman,et al.  Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  Peter Zioupos,et al.  Accumulation of in‐vivo fatigue microdamage and its relation to biomechanical properties in ageing human cortical bone , 2001, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  K. Jepsen.  The aging cortex: to crack or not to crack , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  E. Radin,et al.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Martin,et al.  Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Keyak,et al.  Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  L Kinzl,et al.  Correlation of bone mineral density with strength and microstructural parameters of cortical bone in vitro. , 2002, Bone.

[19]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[20]  R. Giardino,et al.  Proximal Femur Geometry To Detect and Distinguish Femoral Neck Fractures from Trochanteric Fractures in Postmenopausal Women , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture load at different skeletal sites by geometric properties of the cortical shell , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  Y. Yeni,et al.  The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. , 1997, Bone.

[23]  Bruce Martin,et al.  Aging and strength of bone as a structural material , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  A. Boskey.  Bone mineral crystal size , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  X Edward Guo,et al.  The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  P Zioupos,et al.  Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. , 1998, Bone.

[27]  P Zioupos,et al.  The effects of ageing and changes in mineral content in degrading the toughness of human femora. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  M. Schaffler.  Bone Fatigue and Remodeling in the Development of Stress Fractures , 2000 .

[29]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  N. Crabtree,et al.  Intracapsular Hip Fracture and the Region‐Specific Loss of Cortical Bone: Analysis by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  A. Hofman,et al.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. , 2004, Bone.